Case study:Wensum River Restoration Strategy: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
|Project picture=Wensum Ryburgh.jpg
|Project picture=Wensum Ryburgh.jpg
|Picture description=Wensum at Great Ryburgh, July 2011 (post-restoration)
|Picture description=Wensum at Great Ryburgh, July 2011 (post-restoration)
|Project summary=The River Wensum Restoration Strategy has been developed by Natural England, in
partnership with the Environment Agency and the Water Management Alliance, to facilitate
restoring the physical functioning of the river in order that it can sustain the wildlife and
fisheries characteristic of a Norfolk chalk river.
In essence parts of the river are too wide, too deep and too straightened, as well as being
heavily impounded by mill structures. The Wensum is also disconnected from its floodplain
by spoil banks resulting from historical dredging for land drainage and industrial (milling)
activities. For the first time we have looked at a whole river scale to see what action needs to
be taken to restore each section of the channel. The main recommendations of the strategy
include narrowing the channel, restoring the gravel bed, reductions in impoundment, reconnecting
the floodplain, improving channel sinuosity and increasing the amount of large
woody material in the channel. There is no intention to return the river to some former
“natural” condition that it might have had at a specified time in the past.
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment

Revision as of 08:40, 3 September 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

5.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 46' 52.77" N, 0° 57' 38.38" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Great Ryburgh End Restoration Scheme, Meander reinstatement on the River Wensum at the Ryburgh Loop, River Tat Restoration Scheme, River Wensum Rehabilitation Project - Bintree, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 10 Lenwade, River Wensum Restoration, Reach 3a Costessey, River rehabilitation on the River Wensum at Swanton Morley, Sculthorpe Moor Restoration Scheme, Upper Wensum Restoration Project
Wensum at Great Ryburgh, July 2011 (post-restoration)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The River Wensum Restoration Strategy has been developed by Natural England, in partnership with the Environment Agency and the Water Management Alliance, to facilitate restoring the physical functioning of the river in order that it can sustain the wildlife and fisheries characteristic of a Norfolk chalk river.

In essence parts of the river are too wide, too deep and too straightened, as well as being heavily impounded by mill structures. The Wensum is also disconnected from its floodplain by spoil banks resulting from historical dredging for land drainage and industrial (milling) activities. For the first time we have looked at a whole river scale to see what action needs to be taken to restore each section of the channel. The main recommendations of the strategy include narrowing the channel, restoring the gravel bed, reductions in impoundment, reconnecting the floodplain, improving channel sinuosity and increasing the amount of large woody material in the channel. There is no intention to return the river to some former “natural” condition that it might have had at a specified time in the past.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Subcatchment:River Wensum


Site

Edit site
Name Bintree
WFD water body codes GB105034051100
WFD (national) typology R19
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel
Reference morphology Single channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Groundwater
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2000/08/01
Works started
Works completed 2000/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 73 k€73,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Environment Agency Simon Johnson
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision Environment Agency Rob Dryden
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Agriculture
Hydromorphology Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Connection to groundwaters
Biology Invertebrates: Taxonomic composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Flood risk management


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bed raising
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Channel narrowing
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Participation in maintenance


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates: Taxonomic composition Yes Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information