Case study:Rother meander reconnection

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 50° 57' 53.35" N, 0° 37' 7.55" W

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E Rother meander reconnection\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=England\" title=\"England\"\u003EEngland\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Monitoring\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"Rother meander reconnection","link":"","lat":50.962861821288,"lon":-0.60436807572842,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes	Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture, Monitoring
Country	England
Main contact forename	Nick
Main contact surname	Elbourne
Main contact user ID	User:NickRRC
Contact organisation	River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site	http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Restored channel shortly after works

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

Shopham Loop is a section of the river Rother, West Sussex between Coultershaw Bridge and Shopham Bridge. A cut was created in the 18th century to bypass the meander and enable passage of boats upstream. However after navigation ceased, the locks were removed and the cut became the main river course with the meander (Shopham Loop) remaining as a backwater. Land use change to an intensive agricultural regime in turn led to shallower soils and increased siltation and the loop entrance became blocked with deposits preventing any flow from the Rother.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Site

Edit site

Name	Shopham Loop
WFD water body codes	GB107041012810
WFD (national) typology	Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name	Western Rother
Pre-project morphology	Single channel, High width:depth, Embanked
Reference morphology	Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body	Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present	No
Invasive species present	No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology	Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate	Silt, Gravel
River corridor land use	Urban, Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category	5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category	2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)	4.974.97 m³/s <br />4,970 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)	1000 m1 km <br />100,000 cm <br />
Project started	2000/03/01
Works started
Works completed	2004/09/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)	580 k€580,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology	Structure & condition of riparian zones, Channel pattern/planform, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology	Poor WFD ecological status for Fish.
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project	Watercourse and floodplain restoration

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications	Re-grading, Creation of stone riffle, Planting
Floodplain / River corridor	Restore and improve floodplain connection, Creation of backwater and ponds
Planform / Channel pattern	Re-instatement of old course, protect old lock from erosion.
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other

Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Structure & condition of riparian zones		Yes	Yes			Improvement
Channel pattern/planform		Yes	Yes			Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Invertebrates	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	Inconclusive
Fish	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Improvement
Macrophytes	No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Additional links and references

Edit links and references

Link	Description
http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/GESO0910BSTC-E-E.pdf	Environment Agency WFD Classification - See P.190.
http://www.therrc.co.uk/case studies/rother%20at%20shopham%20loop%20final.pdf	RRC Case Study - Shopham Loop

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information