Case study:Upper Welland Water Friendly Farming Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
|Location=52.6379318237304, -0.920213162899017
|Location=52.6379318237304, -0.920213162899017
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=In progress
   
|Country=England
   
|Main contact forename=Chris
      Complete
|Main contact surname=Stoate
|Project web site url=
|Contact organisation=Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
     
|Multi-site=No
|Themes=
     
|Country=
      England
|Main contact forename=
      Chris
|Main contact surname=
      Stoate
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}

Revision as of 14:39, 22 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 38' 16.55" N, 0° 55' 12.77" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes
Country England
Main contact forename Chris
Main contact surname Stoate
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Pollution incident
Hydromorphology
Biology Invertebrates, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Specific synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Reduce diffuse pollution
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other UK BAP habitat creation/restoration, Non BAP habitat creation/restoration, Farm infrastructure interventions
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Fencing, Non/agricultural business changed its way of working
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information