Case study:River Wandle: Butter Hill Phase 1: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Planned
|Status=Planned
|Themes=Fisheries
|Themes=Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=England
|Country=England
|Main contact forename=Dave
|Main contact forename=Dave

Revision as of 07:21, 10 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 22' 13.42" N, 0° 9' 35.44" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Dave
Main contact surname Bartlett
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations Wandle Trust, Wild Trout Trust, Sutton County Council
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Reduction in height of three weirs and habitat creation in preparation for the reintroduction of a population of Wandle Trout. Fish pass on Butterhill Mill. In-stream diversity, weir adjustment and habitat connectivity. Fish pass on large weir sluice. Failing WFD for fish pass due to impassible nature of the river, and the prime trout habitat in the area is currently inaccessible. A lack of native trout and suitable connected habitat. Designing for low flow and climate change. Previously deculverted and restored stretch of the Wandle ecologically isolated by the weir at Butter Hill Mill

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 360 m0.36 km <br />36,000 cm <br />
Project started 2009/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information