Case study:Beverley Park: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
        
        
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Planned
   
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
   
|Country=England
      Complete
|Main contact forename=Joanna
|Project web site url=
|Main contact surname=Heisse
     
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Themes=
|Contact organisation url=www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
     
|Multi-site=No
|Country=
|Project summary=Potential for realignment/restoration/enhancement works to the river and floodplain. Potential for establishment of the marginal/bankside habitat by reducing shading from excessive tree cover and regrading the banks and removing the fencing along the river. This would improve the ecological value of river and river corridor, visibility of the river and access to the river. There is also the potential for wetland creation with the park, and habitat for bats in the culvert to the north of the park. Reconnect river to it’s floodplain; improve water quality by introducing riparian vegetation and establishing currently nonexistent bankside and emergent habitats; provide access to nature and improve amenity value of the park.
      England
|Main contact forename=
      Joanna
|Main contact surname=
      Heisse
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
     
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Image_gallery}}
{{Image_gallery}}

Revision as of 10:55, 7 April 2014

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Water quality, Urban
Country England
Main contact forename Joanna
Main contact surname Heisse
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/environment-agency
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Potential for realignment/restoration/enhancement works to the river and floodplain. Potential for establishment of the marginal/bankside habitat by reducing shading from excessive tree cover and regrading the banks and removing the fencing along the river. This would improve the ecological value of river and river corridor, visibility of the river and access to the river. There is also the potential for wetland creation with the park, and habitat for bats in the culvert to the north of the park. Reconnect river to it’s floodplain; improve water quality by introducing riparian vegetation and establishing currently nonexistent bankside and emergent habitats; provide access to nature and improve amenity value of the park.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 400 m0.4 km <br />40,000 cm <br />
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information