Case study:Manor Park: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Project title=Manor Park
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Themes=Flood risk management
|Themes=Flood risk management
Line 12: Line 11:
|Main contact forename=Toni
|Main contact forename=Toni
|Main contact surname=Scarr
|Main contact surname=Scarr
|Main contact id=Ascarr
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation=Environment Agency
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk
|Contact organisation url=www.environment-agency.gov.uk
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Quaggy Flood Alleviation Scheme
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Quaggy Flood Alleviation Scheme
|Project summary=Manor Park was redesigned to tackle the Japanese knotweed on site, rather than dumping it in a hazardous landfill site hundreds of miles away. This invasive species can be a huge problem as it grows very quickly and crowds out all other plants and wildlife if left unmanaged.
 
Also at Manor Park, wetland areas and wildflower meadows have been created. We’ve updated and improved the play area. And it is now much easier for people to access the river itself
}}
}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}

Revision as of 13:02, 23 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 27' 20.27" N, 0° 0' 10.52" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management
Country England
Main contact forename Toni
Main contact surname Scarr
Main contact user ID User:Ascarr
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Quaggy Flood Alleviation Scheme

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Manor Park was redesigned to tackle the Japanese knotweed on site, rather than dumping it in a hazardous landfill site hundreds of miles away. This invasive species can be a huge problem as it grows very quickly and crowds out all other plants and wildlife if left unmanaged.

Also at Manor Park, wetland areas and wildflower meadows have been created. We’ve updated and improved the play area. And it is now much easier for people to access the river itself

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Manor Park
WFD water body codes GB106039023290
WFD (national) typology Calcareous
WFD water body name Quaggy
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information