Case study:Greenwich Peninsula: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Case study subcatchment}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=Greenwich Penisula
|Name=Greenwich Peninsula
|WFD water body code=GB530603911402,
|WFD (national) typology=intertidal,
|WFD water body name=THAMES MIDDLE
|WFD water body name=THAMES MIDDLE
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|Protected species present=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=Yes
|Invasive species present=Yes
|Dominant hydrology=Estuary,  
|Dominant hydrology=Estuary,
|Dominant substrate=Estuarine mud,  
|Dominant substrate=Estuarine mud,
|River corridor land use=Urban,  
|River corridor land use=Urban,
}}
}}
{{Project background
{{Project background

Revision as of 19:03, 22 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.50
(2 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 30' 11.64" N, 0° 0' 10.92" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Spatial planning
Country England
Main contact forename Toni
Main contact surname Scarr
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Tidal terraces

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


prior to 2000 1.7km of flood defences were replaced and refurbished on the eastern side of the peninsula

A further 700m proposed on the western frontage.

• The intertidal terraces provide valuable habitat for fish and other animals and birds, as well as creating a new landscape feature for people to enjoy. • Flood defences designed to protect from tidal flooding with an allowance made for the future effects of climate change. • Surface water flood risk reduction on each plot will be provided in line with the London Plan policies.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Greenwich Peninsula
WFD water body codes GB530603911402
WFD (national) typology intertidal
WFD water body name THAMES MIDDLE
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Estuary
Dominant substrate Estuarine mud
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 24002,400 m <br />2.4 km <br />240,000 cm <br />
Project started 1998/01/01
Works started 1999/01/01
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management, Navigation
Hydromorphology Structure & condition of intertidal zone
Biology Fish, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project millenium project; housing development


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Bank improvement, creation of intertidal terraces
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


during construction


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Case study no 4

Design Guidance includign Greenwich as an example


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information