Case study:Mill Pool: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
• Worked in collaboration with local authority and local artist to produce seating area design. | • Worked in collaboration with local authority and local artist to produce seating area design. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Roding | |Subcatchment=Roding | ||
Line 77: | Line 81: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 84: | Line 86: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Revision as of 07:07, 6 September 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Social benefits |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Toni |
Main contact surname | Scarr |
Main contact user ID | User:Ascarr |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Previous site use/issues
• There was poor riverside habitat as the site was formed of concrete banks and concrete revetment. The site is above a tidal barrier but does receive tidal variations on spring tides.
• The seating area on the edge of Mill Pool and the River Roding was largely redundant and unused.
• The design of the site limits the views from the site.
• The site did not convey any understanding about historic importance of the Mill Pool to Barking.
Enhancements
• ’Terracing’ of existing concrete riverbank to create intertidal habitat. The terraces are back filled with an appropriate gravel substrate and clad with timber sourced sustainably.
• Redesign of riverside seating area to improve outlook and convey information about historic importance of the Mill Pool.
• Worked in collaboration with local authority and local artist to produce seating area design.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|