Case study:Moreton Channel Gravel Reprofiling: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:
{{Motivations
{{Motivations
|Specific mitigation=WFD assessment determined 'poor' ecological status for waterbody. Channel restoration measure to increase morphological complexity and habitat diversity.
|Specific mitigation=WFD assessment determined 'poor' ecological status for waterbody. Channel restoration measure to increase morphological complexity and habitat diversity.
|Biological quality elements=Fish, Macrophytes,
}}
}}
{{Measures
{{Measures

Revision as of 17:53, 20 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 50° 42' 27.12" N, 2° 16' 49.41" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country England
Main contact forename Alasdair
Main contact surname Maxwell
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Environment Agency
Contact organisation web site http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Moreton Channel
WFD water body codes GB108044009690
WFD (national) typology Low, Medium, Calcareous
WFD water body name Frome Dorset (Lower) & Furzebrook Stream
Pre-project morphology Very little geomorphological diversity or in channel features.
Reference morphology Increased channel complexity, supporting greater ecological diversity.
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Brown trout, salmon, grayling, bullhead, minnow, brook-lamprey & stoneloach
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Rural - mixed land use.
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2010/09/01
Works completed 2010/09/05
Project completed
Total cost category 1 - 10 k€
Total cost (k€) 72007,200 k€ <br />7,200,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Environment Agency and Frome, Piddle and West Dorset Fishery Association

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure WFD assessment determined 'poor' ecological status for waterbody. Channel restoration measure to increase morphological complexity and habitat diversity.
Hydromorphology
Biology Fish, Macrophytes
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Reprofiling of channel bed to create more diverse habitat for aquatic organisms - eg. habitat suitable for fish throughout their lifecycle (spawning to adult). Some LWD dams placed to further improve habitat diversity - deep pools, exposed gravel berms and bankside gravel pinch points.
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement
Macrophytes Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information