Case study:River Cole- Life Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
}}
}}
{{Site
{{Site
|Name=
|Name=River Cole
   
|WFD water body code=GB106039023730
   
|WFD water body name=Cole (Bower Bridge to Thames) including Coleshill
      River Cole
|Pre-project morphology=Straight,Single channel
|WFD water body code=
|Reference morphology=Sinuous
     
|Heavily modified water body=Yes
|WFD (national) typology=
|Protected species present=No
     
|Invasive species present=No
|WFD water body name=
|Dominant substrate=Bedrock,Boulders,Gravel
     
|River corridor land use=Extensive agriculture
|Pre-project morphology=
|Average bankfull channel width category=2 - 5 m
      Straight,Single channel
|Average bankfull channel depth category=0.5 - 2 m
|Reference morphology=
|Avrg channel gradient=0.0008
      Sinuous
|Heavily modified water body=
      true
|Local site designation=
     
|Site designation=
     
|Protected species present=
     
|Invasive species present=
     
|Species=
     
|Dominant hydrology=
     
|Dominant substrate=
      Bedrock,Boulders,Gravel
|River corridor land use=
      Extensive agriculture
|Average bankfull channel width category=
      2 - 5 m
|Avrg bankfull channel width=
     
|Average bankfull channel depth category=
      0.5 - 2 m
|Avrg1 bankfull channel depth=
     
|Mean discharge category=
     
|Mn discharge=
     
|Average channel gradient category=
     
|Avrg channel gradient=
     
}}
}}
{{Project_background
{{Project_background

Revision as of 15:17, 15 August 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 38' 22.09" N, 1° 39' 46.08" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
Country England
Main contact forename Martin
Main contact surname Janes
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations Environment Agency, National Trust, Countryside Commission, English Nature
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district
River basin Humber

Subcatchment

River name River Cole
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: The River Cole and Tyseley Energy Park: Creation of Community Commons


Site

Edit site
Name River Cole
WFD water body codes GB106039023730
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Cole (Bower Bridge to Thames) including Coleshill
Pre-project morphology Straight, Single channel
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Bedrock, Boulders, Gravel
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.0008
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood defence
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Channel pattern/planform, Width & depth variation
Biology Invertebrates: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Habitat diversity


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Planting, Depth modification
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Introduction of sinuosity, Creation of secondary channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information