Case study:Manor Park: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Quaggy Flood Alleviation Scheme | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Quaggy Flood Alleviation Scheme | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Thames21 ManorPark, Lewisham.jpg | |||
|Picture description=Riverbank Management on the Quaggy, Source: natureconservationlewisham.co.uk | |||
|Project summary=Manor Park was redesigned to tackle the Japanese knotweed on site, rather than dumping it in a hazardous landfill site hundreds of miles away. This invasive species can be a huge problem as it grows very quickly and crowds out all other plants and wildlife if left unmanaged. | |Project summary=Manor Park was redesigned to tackle the Japanese knotweed on site, rather than dumping it in a hazardous landfill site hundreds of miles away. This invasive species can be a huge problem as it grows very quickly and crowds out all other plants and wildlife if left unmanaged. | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 10 May 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Location: 51° 27' 20.27" N, 0° 0' 10.52" W
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Flood risk management |
Country | England |
Main contact forename | Toni |
Main contact surname | Scarr |
Main contact user ID | User:Ascarr |
Contact organisation | Environment Agency |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Manor Park was redesigned to tackle the Japanese knotweed on site, rather than dumping it in a hazardous landfill site hundreds of miles away. This invasive species can be a huge problem as it grows very quickly and crowds out all other plants and wildlife if left unmanaged.
Also at Manor Park, wetland areas and wildflower meadows have been created. We’ve updated and improved the play area. And it is now much easier for people to access the river itself
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Catchment and subcatchment
Select a catchment/subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Site
Name | Manor Park |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | GB106039023290 |
WFD (national) typology | Calcareous |
WFD water body name | Quaggy |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | Yes |
Species of interest | Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica) |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Urban |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information