Difference between revisions of "Hull and East Riding Catchment Partnership"

From RESTORE
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 88: Line 88:
 
{{Additional Documents end}}
 
{{Additional Documents end}}
 
{{Additional links and references header}}
 
{{Additional links and references header}}
{{Additional links and references
 
|Link=https://www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/images/17-05-22-Hull-and-East-Riding-Catchment-Plan-Consultation-Version.pdf
 
|Description=Hull and East Riding Catchment Plan
 
}}
 
 
{{Additional links and references
 
{{Additional links and references
 
|Link=environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/ManagementCatchment/3039
 
|Link=environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/ManagementCatchment/3039
Line 99: Line 95:
 
|Link=www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/humber
 
|Link=www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/humber
 
|Description=CaBA website - Humber
 
|Description=CaBA website - Humber
 +
}}
 +
{{Additional links and references
 +
|Link=https://www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/images/17-05-22-Hull-and-East-Riding-Catchment-Plan-Consultation-Version.pdf
 +
|Description=Hull and East Riding Catchment Plan
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Additional links and references footer}}
 
{{Additional links and references footer}}

Revision as of 12:48, 21 February 2018

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified
Edit location



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status
Project web site
Themes
Country
Main contact forename
Main contact surname
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Barmston Sea Drain (map)
River Foulness (map)
Gypsey Race (map)
Lower Hull (map)
Upper Hull (map)
South Holderness Drains (map)
Hull AquaGreens Programme (urban SuDS)
Lowthorpe Diversion Project
Barmston Drain
Gypsey Race at Boynton Bridge (D Croft)
Hornsea Mere and bird hide (Jess Charlton)
River Hull Tidal Barrier (Hull City Council)
River Hull at Wansford Bridge (Yorkshire Wildlife Trust)
Skerne Wetlands, River Hull Headwaters (Yorkshire Wildlife Trust)
South Lagoon, Tophill Low Nature Reserve (Yorkshire Water)
Market Weighton Canal
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://environment.data.gov.uk/catchment-planning/ManagementCatchment/3039 Hull and East Riding Environment Agency environmental data
http://www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/humber CaBA website - Humber
http://https://www.catchmentbasedapproach.org/images/17-05-22-Hull-and-East-Riding-Catchment-Plan-Consultation-Version.pdf Hull and East Riding Catchment Plan

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information


River Hull Wansford (low res).jpg 17-03-15 HER Operational Catchments v4.jpg


Background

In 2012, Defra introduced the catchment based approach (CaBA) - a community-led approach that engages people and groups from across society to help improve our water environments. Defra drives CaBA through a national network of catchment partnerships. These partnerships are expected to identify local priorities and tackle cross-cutting issues; ensure that the work of partners is coordinated; and deliver improvements across their catchments.

Established in 2014, the Hull and East Riding Catchment Partnership is hosted by the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust with support from the East Yorkshire Rivers Trust as Joint Host. They are joined on the partnership by the Beverley and North Holderness Internal Drainage Board, East and North Yorkshire Waterways Partnership, East Riding of Yorkshire Council, Environment Agency, Hull City Council, Natural England, Ouse and Humber Drainage Board, South Holderness Internal Drainage Board and Yorkshire Water.

Unlike most other catchments, the Hull and East Riding catchment area comprises a series of distinct and often discrete watercourses / water bodies, known locally as: Barmston Sea Cut; Gypsey Race; Hornsea Mere; Market Weighton Canal and River Foulness; River Hull; and the South Holderness Drains (Burstwick, Keyingham, Ottringham, Thorngumbald and Winestead).

Most of these water bodies are separate from the main inland waterway network. Together, though, they are crucial to the drainage of the Yorkshire Wolds and the East Riding and to the unique landscape character of the region.

In March 2017, the Hull and East Riding Catchment Partnership published its first catchment plan, which explains how partners are using the CaBA to make a difference in the water environment, in local communities and to the local economy – now and in the long term. The document also demonstrates the partnership's strong track record of collaborative working and includes case studies which illustrate the partnership's capacity for effective catchment management.

Case studies

Loading map...


Contact us

Annabel Hanson User:Ahanson


Partner organisations

Yorkshire Wildlife Trust; East Yorkshire Rivers Trust; Beverley and North Holderness Internal Drainage Board; East and North Yorkshire Waterways Partnership; East Riding of Yorkshire Council; Environment Agency; Hull City Council; Natural England; Ouse and Humber Drainage Board; South Holderness Internal Drainage Board and Yorkshire Water.

Upload files

Special:Upload






Image gallery