Case study:Tahlequah History Trail - Illinois River Restoration Project

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 35° 55' 8.39" N, 94° 58' 19.33" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://lid.okstate.edu/illinois-river-restoration-project-information
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country USA
Main contact forename Jason
Main contact surname Vogel
Main contact user ID User:Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://http://lid.okstate.edu/natural-stream-restoration
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Illinios River-Private Property1, Illinois River- Private Property 3, Illinois River- Private Property2, Tahlequah Felts Park- Illlinois River Restoration Project, Tahlequah History Trail - Illinois River Restoration Project, Tahlequah Kaufman Park, Tahlequah Sequoyah Park - Illinois River Restoration Project, Tahlequah- Peavine Hollow
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Funding for this project is a result of a Clean Water Act State Revolving Fund Principal Forgiveness loan awarded by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board to the Oklahoma Conservation Commission. The money for the principal forgiveness loan comes as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The ARRA required that states use 20% of their funds on green projects and since all natural methods will be used to stabilize the banks and improve water quality this project qualifies.

The loan’s purpose is to use natural techniques to stabilize eroding streambanks which will help improve water quality and reduce the amount of sediment entering the system. Loan proceeds will be used in the Illinois River and the Eucha/Spavinaw watersheds in northeast Oklahoma. These two watersheds were selected because several of the waterbodies in them are listed on Oklahoma’s Integrated Report as being impaired by nutrients and related causes. Both watersheds provide water for several communities ranging in size from less than 1,000 to over 300,000. Over million is being directed to the watersheds to improve water quality by instilling best management practices to reduce nonpoint source pollution. While these practices are resulting in noticeable improvements to the nutrient, sediment and bacteria loading, erosion is still a cause for concern. This project will help address this issue by stabilizing streambanks on twelve sites in the Illinois River watershed. Identification and prioritization of sites in the Illinois River and Eucha/Spavinaw watersheds are being done, and as money becomes available additional sites can be repaired.

The type of restoration work that will be done in the watershed is an environmentally sound approach that applies the principles of fluvial geomorphology to restore the stream system as close as possible to its natural condition. This approach will use locally available, natural materials such as boulders, rocks, fallen trees and root wads. These materials will be used to help re-direct the flow of the river to a more natural flow path, thereby taking pressure off an eroding streambank. In addition native plants will be used to re-vegetate the streambank helping to further stabilize them resulting in less sediment being pulled into the stream.

SITE SELECTION: This watershed was selected because it is one of the state’s highest priority watersheds serving as a water supply to numerous communities in several counties, as well as being designated as one of Oklahoma’s scenic rivers. Several stream segments are listed on the state’s impaired waters list for nutrients and related causes. In addition, this watershed has been the focus of an extensive program to implement best management practices and encourage enrollment in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) to improve water quality by reducing phosphorus.

Staff from the OCC and Oklahoma Department of Wildlife developed a list of over 48 sites that would benefit from restoration work. Then, to narrow the field down to sites that could be completed within the funding time frame the OCC, staff from OSU and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permitting division narrowed the list of sites down to 11. Repair of these sites will provide substantial water quality and aesthetic improvement and will be able to be permitted and all work completed within the funding time frame. Four of the sites are located on the Illinois River, one site is on Barron Fork Creek, one site is on Tyner Creek and five sites are located within the city of Tahlequah on Town Branch Creek or a tributary.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information