Case study:Reopening side channels along the Saône in Jassans-Riottier

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 45° 59' 2.73" N, 4° 45' 32.04" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country France
Main contact forename Noël
Main contact surname Corget
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Voies navigables de France (VNF)
Contact organisation web site http://www.vnf.fr/vnf/home.vnf?action=vnf
Partner organisations Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse water agency, Ain departmental territorial directorate (DDT 01). Saône and Doubs public river-basin territorial agency, “Porte Ouest de la Dombe” intermunicipal association.
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Diagram showing the works done in the town of Jassans-Riottier. (Voies navigables de France).

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


As part of a programme in the Saone River, an assessment was run in 2003 to identify problems along the river and propose solutions adapted to the local issues.

The assessment pinpointed the areas suitable for ecological development work, with a low topographic level, without any major projects or issues nearby, and having worthwhile ecological potential (alluvial areas, etc.). It also identified areas of interest for tourism infrastructure along the river (boating sites, etc.).

Subsequently, VNF, the managing authority for the waterway, decided to work on the wetlands that were filling in along the Saône in the town of Jassans-Riottier. This project was part of the contract for the floodable Saône valley and met one of its objectives, namely to restore and protect natural environments.

Works were done on the remains of wetlands that still existed along the Saône. In 2007, secondary channels and ponds that were continuously or intermittently linked to the Saône were restored by moving 12,000 m³ of earth.

Then the worked and graded sites and banks were planted with 8 000 clumps of helophytes comprising a total of ten species.

The foot of the bank at the connection point with the Saône was bio-engineered over a distance of 40 metres to limit erosion and the effects of ships’ wakes on the restored alluvial zone.

A sluice ensures continuous connection between the river bed and the side channel.

In 2008, all the worked surfaces, not including the low areas, were planted with grass and the service road was restored with a stone surface.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


A brief pre-works report was drafted in the framework of the preliminary study. It contained topographical measurements and an analysis of the terrestrial vegetation in the side channels that were slowly filling in.

Following the works, ecological monitoring by a consulting firm was carried out over four years from 2009 to 2012.

Monitoring addressed the physical compartment, e.g. with topographic, temperature and physical-chemical surveys, and the biological compartment with an analysis on phytoplankton, zooplankton, fish and the aquatic and riparian vegetation. An analysis on visits to the site and on site maintenance (number of visits, damage done to installations, etc.) was also carried out.

The topographic profiles prepared in 2009 revealed a high level of local sedimentation causing a narrowing of the side channel. On the basis of the results from 2010 to 2012, this sedimentation is apparently caused by readjustments on the worked site where successive floods and the wakes of ships even out the profile of the side channels.

The modifications made at the foot of the embankment limited erosion as planned.

However, the analysis also revealed that the wakes of ships produced effects in the side channel and represented a significant pressure on the environment by limiting biological development. Fine sediment in the side channel was regularly resuspended in the water by the wakes, which may reduce the environmental value of the area.

Monitoring of the fish populations revealed an increase in the number of species caught in the side channel, from 17 species in 2010 to 21 in 2012. In the spring, the time of rising water levels, the side channel remains a calm environment that is favourable for small species. At the beginning of the fall of 2012, the side channel was home to a diversified and more abundant community than in the spring, due to the hydrology of the Saône and to the development of the grass beds that enhanced site attractiveness. In addition, a number of fish-eating species were noted, including perch, pikeperch and pike, re-observed for the first time in 2012.

The aquatic vegetation in the continuously filled pond underwent considerable change with respect to the observations made from 2009 to 2011. The dominant Nuttall’s pondweed, an invasive alien species, gave way to significant development of rigid hornwort, a native species. The number of inventoried plant species remained virtually identical. A stabilisation process would seem to be under way in some of the side channels.

The VNF technical department and the town are satisfied with the operation. However, the large number of visits to the site have resulted in vandalism creating pressure on the vegetation and incurring additional costs for maintenance and the installation of systems to limit access.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Earthwork to restore a side channel and ponds. October 2007. (Voies navigables de France (VNF).
Flooding of the restored side channel. December 2009. (Voies navigables de France (VNF).
The vegetation in the restored side channel had developed well 4.5 years after the works. September 2012. (Voies navigables de France (VNF).
Observation hut for wildlife that burned in November 2008 and was replaced by an elevated boardwalk. July 2008. (Voies navigables de France (VNF).
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes FRDR1807b
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 215215 m <br />0.215 km <br />21,500 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 100 - 1000 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 400400 m³/s <br />400,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br />
Project started 2007/09/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2008/04/01
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 245245 k€ <br />245,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Rhône-Méditerranée-Corse water agency (60%), Rhône-Alpes region (20%), Voies navigables de France (20%)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Riparian development
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Improve site landscaping for tourism, Recreate diverse habitats for various species.


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Restoration of the connection of side arms, reconnection of ponds, installation of bio-engeneering bank protection, instalation of a sluice, Planting, Helophytes planted
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.onema.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/afb rex r1 saone gb v3.pdf All information on this page is copied from the AFB, The French Agency for biodiversity.

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information