Case study:Removal of five Lakes on the Val des Choues stream
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | Bertrande |
Main contact surname | Barre |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Office National de Forêts |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Val de Choues stream is a tributary of the Ource and is 5.5 kilometres in length.
In 1968, with a view to salmonid farming, the ancient Narlin pond, originally created by the monks of a local abbey, was transformed into a complex of five ponds. This fish farm proved to be unprofitable and was abandoned in 1973. The fragmentation of the stream by the ponds modified the environment and increased the fragility of the crayfish population (the watercourse was cut off from its main tributaries, temperature changes occurred, there was influx of undesirable fish species and an obstacle was created to the free movement of fish and crayfish).
In the framework of the “LIFE” Nature Programme, this site was chosen for a project concerning the restoration of white-clawed crayfish.
The water bodies were drained in two phases. In June 2006, the three upstream ponds were drained and the fish were rescued. The embankments were opened in August. In September 2006, the two remaining downstream ponds, which until then had been acting as sedimentation basins, were drained and the embankments were then opened in November.
The most upstream pond could not be removed due to its major heritage value (historic and faunistic). This pond was linked to the other ponds by the watercourse and a parallel canal (created for fish-farming purposes). In order to reduce the drying out of the watercourse, the entire flow emerging from the pond was redirected towards the stream by dismantling the dividing weir that was responsible for supplying water to the canal and by partially filling in the upstream section of this canal. Developments were made in order to diversify the habitats in the original watercourse (laying of limestone blocks) and a gate was installed in the upstream water body.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|