Case study:Removal of Maisons-Rouges dam over the River Vienne
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Hydropower |
Country | France |
Main contact forename | ONEMA |
Main contact surname | ONEMA |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Onema-Delegation Interregional Centre - Poitou - Charentes |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Vienne is a tributary of the Loire and drains a catchment area covering 21,105 km². The Creuse, a main tributary of the Vienne, flows into it around fifty kilometres upstream of theconfluence of the Loire and Vienne. Situated approximately 250 km from the sea, both of these sub-basins historically attracted salmon, shad, sea lamprey and eels.
At the start of the 1920s, Maisons-Montrouge dam was built to a height of 3.8 metres over the Vienne in order to meet the power requirements of the paper mills. This dam created a blockage in both of these basins. The virtually stagnant impoundment caused by the dam was estimated to cover 15 km in total: 8 km on the Creuse and 7 km on the Vienne.
The consequences were immediate, because since the building of the structure, not a single salmon or shad had been caught in the waters upstream of Maisons-Rouges. The successive installation of three fish-passes had very little effect.
In 1948, EDF (French electricity supply company) took over the concession and automated the dam in 1980. In January 1994, a “Plan Loire Grandeur Nature” (long-term management plan for the River Loire) was launched; it included the removal of the Maisons-Rouges dam due to its numerous effects on river continuity and its low level of economic benefit.
The project did not meet with universal approval, but after four years of negotiations and enquiries, the removal of the Maisons-Rouges dam was scheduled.
The project consisted of partially removing the oblique dam and the mill building. The operation was carried out in three phases:
• Installation of protective dikes and removal of the transversal dam.
• Gradual lowering of the impoundment and removal of the protective dikes on the right bank.
• Installation of protective dikes on the left bank in order to maintain dry conditions on the worksite and for the demolition of the buildings.
The transversal dam, the three sluice gates and the flap were dismantled. A concrete slab was laid on the bottom of the river in order to limit the effects of bed scouring and slow down the downstream migration of sediments.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|