Case study:Ontpoldering Noordwaard

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 46' 27.32" N, 4° 46' 22.84" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Rijkswaterstaat Realisatieteam West
Main contact surname Rijkswaterstaat Realisatieteam West
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Rijkswaterstaat Realisatieteam West
Contact organisation web site http://https://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/project/ontpoldering-noordwaard/
Partner organisations Provincie Noord-Brabant, Gemeente Werkendam, Waterschap Rivierenland
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Room for the River

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


By lowering dykes and moving dykes land inward, larger parts of the Noordwaard will be subject to flooding, thereby allowing more water from the Nieuwe Merwede river to flow to sea during high water events. When the works on the dykes have been completed the area will flood at least several times per year, particularly in winter. A number of building in the area will therefore be placed on terps. Land outside the new flood areas will stil be arable.

This results in 30 cm. lower water levels at the town of Gorinchem. Nature benefits as well, also this area borders on the Biesbosch, thus expanding the surface of this natural estuarine area.

As the area will be open for public there are also new opportunities for walking, cycling, canooing.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2011/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2015/12/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Flow velocities, Quantity & dynamics of flow
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Lowering of dike, Moving dikes more inward
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Placing buildings on terps
Social measures (incl. engagement) Creation of opportunities for walking, cycling and canooing
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://issuu.com/ruimtevoorderivier/docs/ontpoldering noordwaard More information can be found at:
http://wiki.reformrivers.eu/index.php/Rhine - Ontpoldering Noordwaard REFORM offers more science oriented information at:

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information