Case study:Lippenbroek Regulated Tidal Exchange Scheme

From RESTORE
Jump to: navigation, search
4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 5' 9", 4° 10' 20"
Edit location
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.lippenbroek.be/
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Belgium
Main contact forename Susanne
Main contact surname Armstrong
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation ABPmer
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations University of Antwerp, W&Z
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The RTE at Lippenbroek - Google Earth derived aerial view

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The University of Antwerp leads the research and management of the project. The research fits mainly in the framework of OMES (a multidisciplinary research study on the environmental effects of the SIGMA plan on the estuarine environment of the Belgian part of the Scheldt), which is funded by W&Z (the Flemish Agency for Waterways and the Brussels-Scheldt Sea Canal).

The Lippenbroek Regulated Tidal Exchange (RTE) scheme is a pilot scheme for the so-called controlled reduced tide (CRT) concept which Belgian authorities are planning to apply to (sections of) numerous flood storage areas in the near future to create tidal habitats (e.g. at Kruibeke, where the first inundation will likely occur in 2011). The CRT concept involves the use of two exchange mediums, one high inlet medium (e.g. a weir/spillway or sluice/culvert), and a lower outlet medium, which may be capped with a gravity controlled sluice gate. As the CRT technique is relatively new, it had to undergo thorough testing before it could be applied on a large scale. For this reason the 10ha Lippenbroek scheme was implemented in the freshwater tidal part of the Scheldt Estuary in 2006. As it was to be a pilot for CRT in a flood storage area, construction included the building of an overflow dike as well as a high inlet sluice for the CRT function.

The high inlet sluice (see pictures below) has an invert level of approximately 4.8mTAW (the Belgian Ordnance Datum) – which equates to approximately 1m below the level of Mean High Water Springs (MHWS). The inlet structure is 12.75m long; the three culverts it contains are each 0.75m wide and 1.1m high. Shot beams front the inlet structure and enable fine-tuning of the invert levels.

The most suitable sluice configuration was determined through several test wettings. For the outflow, a pre-existing outfall sluice, which is about 10m to the left of the inlet sluice structure, is utilised. Its invert level is at 1.5mTAW; the pipe is 40.2m long and has a 1.5m diameter. An artificial creek was dug connecting the inlet sluice level with the existing polder ditch. The danger of channels short-circuiting was diminished by subduing the channel along the foot of the ring dike(personal communication with Tom Maris, University of Antwerp; Cox et al., 2006). An intensive monitoring programme was initiated, and the first results are now available.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


An extensive monitoring programme has been initiated to research the development of the site. Nine research groups from different universities and research institutes are working together to achieve optimal linkage of results on the following factors (Maris et al., 2008): Basic water quality (4/annum) Sedimentation/erosion (4/annum) Bioturbation (4/annum) Soil heavy metal (4/annum) Birds (52/annum) Soil nutrients (4/annum) Creek morphology (2/annum) Suspended solids (continuous) Fish (2/annum) Tidal regime (continuous) Ground compaction (4/annum) Vegetation (4/annum) Light climate (4/annum) Water balance (continuous) Macro-invertebrates (4/annum) Water heavy metal (4/annum) Sediment size (4/annum)

Sedimentation: With respect to sedimentation, Maris et al. (2008) point out that whilst sedimentation is on the one hand desired in tidal marshes there are also associated negative implications. The input of fresh sediment enables the advancement of typical marsh morphology and marsh soil, which in turn promotes the establishment of estuarine vegetation and fauna. Conversely excessive sedimentation is to be avoided in a flood storage polder, as this leads to decreased water storage capacity. Due to the enclosed nature of a flood storage polder, the environment is less dynamic and thus the potential for sedimentation is increased, particularly during longer stagnant phases. At Lippenbroek, at all but one of the 10 sedimentation measurement sites, net sedimentation was observed between March 2006 and November 2007, varying between 0.5 to 12.5 cm/year.

Sedimentation was strongly related to flooding frequency; i.e. the highest sedimentation rate was observed at sites inundated around 85% of the time. The average sedimentation rate is currently fairly high at approximately 4 cm/year. The lowest sites are accreting fastest, hence the polder is loosing slope. Outside the polder, in natural marshes, an increase in elevation would lead to a decrease in flooding frequency, and a consequent gradual decrease in sedimentation. Conversely in the CRT the flooding frequency is not directly coupled to elevation; the intake volume is stipulated by the sluice configuration.

Fauna: Macro invertebrate monitoring shows that there has been a shift from terrestrial species to more aquatic and estuarine species (Maris et al., 2008). With regards to birds, despite the high degree of disruption by humans (including site visitors,cyclists and walkers on the dike), a clear change in the numbers and species of birds using the site could be observed when compared to baseline conditions. Of the 4,089 individuals observed during the first year of monitoring, 30% were benthic foragers (19 species), 54% wetland-generalists (11 species), 8% terrestrial generalists (18 species) and 8% woodland birds (13 species). Occasionally night herons Nycticorax nycticorax and spoonbills Platalea leucorodia were observed feeding (Maris et al., 2008). In order for a CRT to fulfil a role for fish, safe passage of the cluvers/sluices is required.

Monitoring indicates that nearly all fish species observed in the Scheldt Estuary were also observed in the polder, frequently in large numbers. Net captures show that only small numbers of fish enter the polder via the inlet sluice, however, the fish tend to find their way into the polder via the outlet sluice. Fish might be attracted by the oxygen rich water which leaves the polder, and thus migrate into the polder against the outflow. A survey undertaken in 2006 (Simoens et al., 2007) found 14 species utilising the site, compared to 15 in the adjacent estuary. Particularly high numbers were observed for the following five species: three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius), amur bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus), stone moroko(Pseudorasbora parva) and European flounder (Platichthys flesus).

Flora: The vegetation monitoring shows a shift in the direction of water tolerant species. Even relatively stress resistant species such as the large nettle and hairy wild rose were replaced by true marsh species within a relatively short time. Colonisation by Lythrum salicaria, Typha latifolia, Veronica, Phragmites australis and willow Salix occurred within one year, whereas at lower elevations vegetation has been replaced by mudflat (Maris et al., 2008).

Water quality: With respect to water quality, the oxygen enriching impact, which is mostly due to the high inlet sluices acting as aerators, has been described as ‘striking’. At the sluices, an immediate increase of up to 60% has been observed and a further 20% enrichment has been attributed to surface oxygenation. On warm, sunny summer days, oxygen reaches even higher values as light penetrates easily through the thin water layer in the polder and oxygen production by primary producers leads to over saturation (Maris et al., 2008). Regulated Tidal Exchange operation: When compared with the Scheldt, high-water levels in Lippenbroek are around 3m lower in elevation, without significantly affecting the pattern of spring and neap tides (Figure 1). Important parts of the polder therefore receive flooding frequencies comparable to those of the fronting saltmarshes. However, the high inlet/low outlet technique does lead to a distortion of the tidal movement; the tidal curve is no longer sinuous but has a stagnant phase. This is due to water only flowing in around high water (‘top of the tide’), and only exiting once water levels outside in the estuary have fallen low enough for the gravity controlled outfall sluice to open. The authors stressed that the inlet structure had to be sufficiently high, to achieve a significant difference in ingress duration and volume, and thus bring about a large variation in water levels. It was also highlighted that flood frequencies are mainly stipulated by the sluice configuration, no longer by the elevation in relation to the tidal frame; this allows marsh development in lower lying areas (Maris et al., 2008).

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The CRT technique employed at Lippenbroek has potential applicability for habitat creation along other heavily developed estuaries. It furthermore represents a technique which can significantly reduce the tidal prism of a site, without compromising the development of a range of intertidal habitats, thus minimising potential negative effects on small estuary systems. The technique also enables the establishment of intertidal habitats at lower elevations in the tidal frame than those of intertidal systems fronting a defence, and would thus be of potential use in areas where land levels behind a defence are relatively low compared to fronting levels. However, longer flood duration and low-turbidity stages may lead to higher accretion rates than in adjacent natural systems(ABPmer, 2008).


Image gallery


The inlet structure at high tide
Spring-Neap Tide Amplitude Comparison Scheldt Estuary – Lippenbroek (Showing Two Spring-Neap Cycles in April/May 2006) (Source: Maris et al., 2008)
1D-Modelling Tidal Curve Comparison Scheldt-Lippenbroek for an Average Tide (Left) and for Neap, Average and Spring Tides (Right) (Source: Maris et al., 2008)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Lippenbroak
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology intertidal
WFD water body name Lower Scheldt estuary
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Tidal
Dominant substrate Estuarine mud
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 10ha
"ha" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Project started
Works started
Works completed 2006/03/01
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Provided by ANB (the Flemish Nature and Forestry Agency) (owners of Lippenbroek).

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.vliz.be/projects/omes/news.php?#lip Case study/monitoring outline of OMES (Research on the environmental effects of the SIGMA plan

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

  • ABPmer, 2008. Habitat Creation in Flood Storage Areas. ABPmer report R.1441

Cox, T., Maris, T., de Vleeschauwer, P., de Mulder, T., Soetaert, K. & Meire, P., 2006. Flood control areas as an opportunity to restore estuarine habitat. Ecological Engineering 28(1), 55-63.

  • Maris, T., Cox, T., Jacobs, S., Beauchard, O., Teuchies, J., van Liefferinge, C., Temmerman, S.,van den Bruwaene, W. & Meire, P., 2008. Natuurontwikkeling in het Lippenbroek - herstel van estuariene natuur via een gecontroleerd gereduceerd getij. Natuur.focus 7(1), 21-27.
  • Maris T., Cox T., Temmerman S., De Vleeschauwer P., Van Damme S., De Mulder T., Van den

Bergh E. and Meire P., 2007. Tuning the tide: creating ecological conditions for tidal marsh development in a controlled inundation area. Hydrobiologia 588, 31-43.

  • Simoens, I., Breine, J., Van Liefferinge, C., Stevens, M., and Belpaire, C., 2007. Het belang van het Lippenbroek als habitat voor vissen in de Zeeschelde. Congres Watersysteemkennis 2006 –2007 - Ecologisch Herstel; 4p.