Case study:Hurdalselva - River Hurdalselv

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 60° 25' 9.39" N, 11° 3' 37.75" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Norway
Main contact forename Bjørn Otto
Main contact surname Dønnum
Main contact user ID User:Arolam
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Subcatchment:002-1568-R


Site

Name Hurdalselva
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology REM1221
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest brown trout (Salmo trutta)
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Cobble, Gravel, bedrock
River corridor land use Mainly forest on the west side of the river and in the upper part of the watershed. Some agriculture (rye, barley) along part of the north-east bank of the project site. Forest is dominantly conifers, but deciduous trees and bushes constitutes apprx. 50% of riparian vegetation
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 1 - 10 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category more than 0.1
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 11001,100 m <br />1.1 km <br />110,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 3232 k€ <br />32,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), private funding, Local fishing associations

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 55 k€ <br />5,000 € <br /> NJFF-Akershus Bjørn Otto Dønnum
Stakeholder engagement and communication 11 k€ <br />1,000 € <br /> Hurdal JFF
Works and works supervision 2626 k€ <br />26,000 € <br /> NVE
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring

Supplementary funding information

This was.....



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flow channelization
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Improving aestethics of the river and riverbank.


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

The works in this particular river stretch was initiated to test different restoration techniques in a rather high gradient river (part of the river section has a gradient of 1,5%). Two days after completion of the in-river works, a large flood (estimated to be a 1:50-year return flood) destroyed part of the constructions. Not very encouraging for the local angling club, because the project was meant to be part of a larger project. Funding however stopped after the trial, and there has not been any attempt to restart the project.