Case study:Fish pass in Las Librerías weir on the Guadiela River

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 40° 30' 40.20" N, 2° 12' 7.44" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower
Country Spain
Main contact forename Rincón Sanz
Main contact surname Gonzalo
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Of the variety of existing fishways, in this particular case the chosen option was the installation of a pool fishpass, the most used kind of fishways.

The advantages of this kind of devices are:

- Little selective. Most fish species will be able to use it effectively.

- It admits wide ranges of flows.

- It presents an optimum behavior against changes of the water level.

The disadvantages of this kind of devices are:

- Plenty of space is required for its installation.

- It needs more maintenance because it can become blocked.

- The price is higher than other fish pass options.

In this case, due to the location of the dam it was decided to build the fishway with a curve of 180 degrees.

Among the alternatives of permeabilization, weir removal was not proposed since the obstacle is in use and it serves to generate hydroelectric energy. An agreement was reached with the owner in order to make a fishway that at least guarantees the circulation of a constant flow downstream the weir.

With this permeabilization it is possible to recover the connectivity between this section and the headwaters of the Guadiela River. However, the presence 3 km downstream of the Los Tilos dam (more than 6m high) prevents this recovery from being complete. It is therefore required to permeabilize this obstacle in order to achieve a more complete reconnection.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The implementation of monitoring programs is essential to evaluate the correct functioning of the fishway. There is no evidence that monitoring programs are being taken for this action.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


This permeabilization represent an improvement in the longitudinal connectivity of this river reach, however it is considered necessary to permeabilize the weir located 3 km downstream in order to achieve a more complete reconnection.


Image gallery


The fishpass built in Las Librerías weir on the Guadiela River. Photo credits: Europa press/JCCM.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Squalius pyrenaicus
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 144144 k€ <br />144,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Part of this work was supported through FEDER funding (European funding to improve the regional development).

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Hydropower
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Creation of fish passes
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://europe.wetlands.org/publications/river-fragmentation-analysis-spain/ A link on the Wetlands International website to a document that describes the project.
http://www.ecohidraulica.com/ All information on this page is copied from the document mentioned above which is written by Ecohidráulica, S.L.

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information

References

Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro (2009). Pasos de peces para permeabilizar estructuras transversales en la cuenca del Ebro. Tecnoma.

WWF (2009). Liberando ríos. Propuestas de la WWF para el desmantelamiento de presas en España.