Case study:Fish pass in Las Librerías weir on the Guadiela River
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Spain |
Main contact forename | Rincón Sanz |
Main contact surname | Gonzalo |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Of the variety of existing fishways, in this particular case the chosen option was the
installation of a pool fishpass, the most used kind of fishways.
The advantages of this kind of devices are:
- Little selective. Most fish species will be able to use it effectively.
- It admits wide ranges of flows.
- It presents an optimum behavior against changes of the water level.
The disadvantages of this kind of devices are:
- Plenty of space is required for its installation.
- It needs more maintenance because it can become blocked.
- The price is higher than other fish pass options.
In this case, due to the location of the dam it was decided to build the fishway with a curve of 180 degrees.
Among the alternatives of permeabilization, weir removal was not proposed since the obstacle is in use and it serves to generate hydroelectric energy. An agreement was reached with the owner in order to make a fishway that at least guarantees the circulation of a constant flow downstream the weir.
With this permeabilization it is possible to recover the connectivity between this section and the headwaters of the Guadiela River. However, the presence 3 km downstream of the Los Tilos dam (more than 6m high) prevents this recovery from being complete. It is therefore required to permeabilize this obstacle in order to achieve a more complete reconnection.
Monitoring surveys and results
The implementation
of monitoring
programs is essential
to evaluate the
correct functioning of
the fishway. There is
no evidence that
monitoring programs
are being taken for
this action.
Lessons learnt
This permeabilization
represent an
improvement in the
longitudinal
connectivity of this
river reach, however
it is considered
necessary to
permeabilize the weir
located 3 km
downstream in order
to achieve a more
complete
reconnection.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information References Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro (2009). Pasos de peces para permeabilizar estructuras transversales en la cuenca del Ebro. Tecnoma. WWF (2009). Liberando ríos. Propuestas de la WWF para el desmantelamiento de presas en España.
|