Case study:Buiten Ooij

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 51' 32.40" N, 5° 53' 42.00" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Gerrit
Main contact surname Van Scherrenburg
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Staatsbosbeheer
Contact organisation web site http://www.staatsbosbeheer.nl/english.aspx
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rhine
River basin Millingerwaard

Subcatchment

River name Waal
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Extensive agriculture, Urban
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beneden-Leeuwen-Side channel, Millingerwaard-Floodplain rehabilitation, Opijnen- Side channel


Site

Name Buiten Ooij - Sluice operation
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology R7
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Impounded
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off
Dominant substrate Gravel, Bedrock
River corridor land use Extensive agriculture, Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 110 m0.11 km <br />11,000 cm <br />
Project started 2008/01/01
Works started 2008/01/01
Works completed 2009/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 1 - 10 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Staatsbosbeheer
Stakeholder engagement and communication Staatsbosbeheer
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance Staatsbosbeheer
Monitoring Staatsbosbeheer



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure agriculture; Depletion of Macrophytes communities
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Flow velocities, Width & depth variation, Continuity for organisms
Biology Macrophytes, Invertebrates, Fish: Species composition, Fish: Abundance
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Oxygen balance
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Water release into floodplain in winter, Closing of sluice in summer, Future floodplain lowering
Planform / Channel pattern Creation of side channel
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions more natural reservoir releases
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Continuity of sediment transport Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Macrophytes Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information