Difference between revisions of "Case study:Bathgate Watercourse Restoration Project"

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 47: Line 47:
|Planform / Channel pattern=Re-meandering, Introducing woody debris,  
|Planform / Channel pattern=Re-meandering, Introducing large woody debris,
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}
{{Hydromorphological quality elements header}}

Revision as of 11:35, 31 May 2017

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 55° 53' 50", -3° 38' 56"
Edit location
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Alison
Main contact surname Baker
Main contact user ID User:Forth Fisheries Trust
Contact organisation River Forth Fisheries Trust
Contact organisation web site http://www.fishforth.co.uk/rfft
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

This project aims to improve the morphology, biodiversity and flood risk management of the Boghead, Bog Burn and Logie Waters which are tributary of the River Avon (Falkirk) which run through Bathgate, West Lothian. The watercourses are currently categorised as Bad for morphology under RBMP and have multiple other issues including fish passage (being addressed separately) as well as flood and amenity issues. This project therefore brings together SEPA, West Lothian Council, Forth Fisheries Trust and the local community to improve the water course.

The project is currently at scoping stage to assess the works required. it is likely that the works will be delivered with a mixture of engineered and low tech solutions.

Part of this work is funded by Heritage Lottery Fund as part of the Almond Avon Reconnection Programme.

Now part of the RiverLife: Almond & Avon project. Two sections involve remeandering the channel and one includes instream woody debris and berms.

Works have been put on hold due to land contamination, although designs are complete and we are hopeful that works will start later in the year.

The RiverLife: Almond & Avon Project is a Scottish Government, SEPA, West Lothian and City of Edingburgh Councils and Heritage Lottery Funded collaborative project managed by the River Forth Fisheries Trust and includes multiple capital projects including the Bathgate Water, Easement of 7 barriers on the Almond, works on the Upper Avon and Killandean. The project is planned to continue from Summer 2016 to Summer 2020.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.

This project will be monitored by electrofishing, habitat and fluvial as well as invertebrate counts.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Image gallery


Catchment and subcatchment

Subcatchment:Avon (Falkirk, Scotland)


WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2016/06/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Scottish Government, SEPA, West Lothian Council, City of Edinburgh Council, Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF).

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance

Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology To improve morphology
Biology Biodiversity
Other reasons for the project


Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Re-meandering, Introducing large woody debris
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)


Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Monitoring documents

Additional documents and videos

Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information