Case study:Bosgården nature-like fishway at River Rolfså
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/rolfsan/Sv/folj-atgardsarbetet/Pages/storan_bosgarden.aspx |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Sweden |
Main contact forename | Andreas |
Main contact surname | Bäckstrand |
Main contact user ID | User:Arolam |
Contact organisation | Länsstyrelsen västra Götalands län |
Contact organisation web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/rolfsan/Sv/folj-atgardsarbetet/Pages/storan bosgarden.aspx |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Building and rebuilding of Bosgården hydroelectric plant during 1940-1960 decreased lake migrating brown trout populations, as 90 % of the spawning grounds were lost. In 1995 three pool-type fishways were constructed and minimum disharge was objected for natural riverbed which was often dry before. Still migrating fish population was suffered from the inconstant and low flows and complete dryness of riverbed for 100 metres at times.
the solution was to replace one pool-type fishway with a nature-like fish channel and tear down a weir in the main river near the outlet of the power plant. In addition, the minimum flow was increased from 300 to 600 L/s and an attraction flow was developed as the power plant shuts down in September and October annually for altogether 90 hours.Increasement of flow has returned spawning habitats to the river.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Skagerrak and Kattegat River basin |
---|---|
River basin | Rolfsån River Basin |
Subcatchment
River name | River Rolfsån |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | Organic (i.e. Peat) |
Ecoregion | Fenno-Scandian Shield |
Dominant land cover | Woodland, Intensive agriculture (arable) |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Apelnäs fishway at River Rolfså, Biologisk återställning i Rolfsåns vattensystem, Dam removal at Grönkullen, River Rolfsån, Restorations of River Nolån-Hulta dam removal, ´Restorations of River Nolån-Bypass channel in Hulta Hydro power plant, ´Restorations of River Nolån-Fishway in Forsa hydro power plant, Ålgårda nature-like bypass channel at River Rolfsån
Site
Name | Bosgården hydropower plant |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Artificial bed, Artificial channel |
Reference morphology | Step-pool |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | Sea migrating brown trout, The freshwater pearl mussel, European eel (Anguilla anguilla) |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | Intensive agriculture (arable) |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | 1 - 10 m³/s |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | 66 m³/s <br />6,000 l/s <br /> |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | 2009/06/04 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 100 - 500 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 290290 k€ <br />290,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information