Case study:Lower Aurino river: Gatzaue riverbed widening

From RESTORE
Revision as of 11:48, 10 January 2013 by Bozbru (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 46° 50' 55.24" N, 11° 57' 20.93" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Social benefits, Spatial planning
Country Italy
Main contact forename Caterina
Main contact surname Ghiraldo
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Aurino river is a typical Alpine watercourse (basin Area 630 km2, average discharge in summer 30-50 m3/s) subject in the past to a radical channalization (riparap) which reduced significantly the width of the riverbed and the morphological structures and dynamics and which caused a general riverbed lowering and the lost of the connection with the floodplain. In the same time the groundwater lowering caused a loss of the hygrophilous riparian forests (Alnus incana). The riverbed widening of Aurino river in Gatzaue was planned mainly to increase the biodiversity and to invert the riverbed and grounwater lowering process. The work was executed by removing a total of 25.000 m3 of gravel from the disconnected floodplain obtaining a total riverbed windening of 35 m; in the same time the riverbed was reshaped (also by inserting big stones and woody debris and creating new branches) to give it a more natural structure. A monitoring activity was implemented to study the geomorphological and biological effects of the project.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment



Site

Edit site
Name Gatzaue
WFD water body codes 03SS3N
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name D_c Torrente Aurino
Pre-project morphology Single channel
Reference morphology Braided
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Bedrock
River corridor land use Grassland
Average bankfull channel width category 10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category 10 - 100 m³/s
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2003
Works started
Works completed 2011/01/04
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Biodiversity increase, flood risk control, morphology restoration
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation, Connection to groundwaters and floodplain
Biology Fish, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Increase social activities


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Riverbed widening, creation of new branches
Floodplain / River corridor Floodplain reconnection
Planform / Channel pattern creation of new natural channels
Other Creation of new lateral habitat for fishes, amphibians and birds (alcedo atthis)
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Citizen participation in the restoration project
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Channel pattern/planform No Yes Yes No Yes Improvement
Connection to groundwaters Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement
Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones No Yes No No No Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates No Yes No Yes Yes Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Riparian vegetation No Yes Yes No No No change


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents


Monitoraggio campana.pdf



Image gallery


Aerial view before works
Aerial view after works
The riverbed after the works


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information