Case study:Ålgårda nature-like bypass channel at River Rolfsån
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Sweden |
Main contact forename | Andreas |
Main contact surname | Bäckstrand |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Länsstyrelsen västra Götalands län |
Contact organisation web site | http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/rolfsan/Sv/folj-atgardsarbetet/Pages/rolfsan.aspx |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The watercourse of the River Rolfsån is one of the rare inland water areas in Sweden where vivid natural salmon and sea trout populations exsist. The river is a habitat for at least three different trout species sea trout (Salmo trutta trutta), lake trout (Salmo trutta lacustris) and stream trout (Salmo trutta fario). Also endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) exist in the watercourse.
The Ålgårda hydropower plant which was built in 1918 has been one of the obsticles for fish migration in the River Rolfså. The object of the restoration was to ensure that fish and other fauna is able to migrate pass the Ålgårda hydro power plant. The application to inforce the power company to build fishway was delivered to Environmental Court in 2011. Nature-like fishway was buit in 2012 and technical fishway is about to be constusted in winter 2012/2013. After the construction of the bypass channel fish and benthic invertebrates has been able to migrate pass the Ålgårda power station.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Skagerrak and Kattegat River basin |
---|---|
River basin | Rolfsån River Basin |
Subcatchment
River name | River Rolfsån |
---|---|
Area category | |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | Organic (i.e. Peat) |
Ecoregion | Fenno-Scandian Shield |
Dominant land cover | Woodland, Intensive agriculture (arable) |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Apelnäs fishway at River Rolfså, Biologisk återställning i Rolfsåns vattensystem, Bosgården nature-like fishway at River Rolfså, Dam removal at Grönkullen, River Rolfsån, Restorations of River Nolån-Hulta dam removal, ´Restorations of River Nolån-Bypass channel in Hulta Hydro power plant, ´Restorations of River Nolån-Fishway in Forsa hydro power plant
Site
Name | Ålgårda hydroelectric power plant |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | |
WFD (national) typology | |
WFD water body name | The River Rolfsån |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | |
River corridor land use | |
Average bankfull channel width category | |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | |
Works completed | |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | |||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | |||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring |
Supplementary funding information
The Ålgårda hydroelectric power plant was built in 1918. Only few salmons could reach Ålgårda because of a number of mills and fishing downstreams.Company was oblicated to built fishway only for eels but after authoroties application of the fishway also for other species in 2011 the court decided that the plant owner was required to build proposed fishway.
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Building nature-like bypass channel, building technical fishway |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information