Case study:Restoring the River Doquette to its original bed

From RESTORE
Revision as of 17:32, 31 July 2012 by AndyL (talk | contribs) (XML import)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country France
Main contact forename Fabien
Main contact surname Goulmy
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Seine-Normandie
River basin sienne

Subcatchment

River name Doquette
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Western Plains
Dominant land cover agriculture, forest
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Percy
WFD water body codes I70490000
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Straight
Reference morphology Single channel, Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Quick run-off, Groundwater
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 2.22.2 m <br />0.0022 km <br />220 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.050.05 m³/s <br />50 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.0011
Average unit stream power (W/m2) 0.2451750.245 W/m² <br />


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 240 m0.24 km <br />24,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2008/10/01
Works completed 2008/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category Less than 10 k€"Less than 10 k€" is not in the list (Less than 1 k€, 1 - 10 k€, 10 - 50 k€, 50 - 100 k€, 100 - 500 k€, 500 - 1000 k€, 1000 - 5000 k€, 5000 - 10000 k€, more than 10000 k€) of allowed values for the "Total cost category" property.
Total cost (k€) 9 k€9,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Water Agency, Regional Council, Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision 1 - 10 k€ 9 k€9,000 € <br /> Fédération de la Manche pour la pêche et la protection du milieu aquatique
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Introducing sediment
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern Re-instatement of old course, Re-instatement of sinuosity
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Promoting riparian vegetation
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information