Case study:The Fortuna Restoration Project

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 45° 11' 28.43" N, 29° 8' 53.17" E

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E The Fortuna Restoration Project\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=Romania\" title=\"Romania\"\u003ERomania\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E \n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"The Fortuna Restoration Project","link":"","lat":45.191231841,"lon":29.148101807,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site
Themes
Country	Romania
Main contact forename	Marian
Main contact surname	Tudor
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district	Danube
River basin

Subcatchment

River name	Sulina Branch
Area category	Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)	2.115 km²211.5 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category	Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m)	1.50 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Dominant geology	Organic (i.e. Peat), clay
Ecoregion	Pontic Province
Dominant land cover	Grassland, Reed
Waterbody ID

Site

Edit site

Name	Forestry polder Fortuna
WFD water body codes	RORW14.1_B5
WFD (national) typology	RO15
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology	Embanked, Forestry area
Reference morphology	Sinuous, Artificial channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body	No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations	RAMSAR site, Biosphere Reserves
Protected species present	No
Invasive species present	No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology	Artificially regulated, Inundabila area
Dominant substrate	Clay, Peat
River corridor land use	Grassland, Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category	10 - 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)	15.0015 m <br />0.015 km <br />1,500 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category	0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)	1.5 m0.0015 km <br />150 cm <br />
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)	69.769.7 m³/s <br />69,700 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient	0.015
Average unit stream power (W/m2)	683.5479683.548 W/m² <br />

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started	1999/12/01
Works started	2004/03/01
Works completed	2004/11/01
Project completed
Total cost category	more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€)	2093000 k€2,093,000,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources	GEF – BM Programe

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design			The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea	Marian	Tudor
Stakeholder engagement and communication			The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Works and works supervision			The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Post-project management and maintenance			The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Authority, Tulcea
Monitoring			The Danube Delta National Institute for Research and Development, Tulcea (office@indd.tim.ro)	Marian	Tudor

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure	Flood risk management
Hydromorphology	Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms, Width & depth variation
Biology	Fish, Macrophytes, Phytoplankton
Physico-chemical	Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications	Create breaches in the bank
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern	Connecting Fishpond Fortuna to the Danube regime
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other

Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow						Improvement
Continuity of sediment transport

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Fish						Improvement
Invertebrates
Macrophytes
Phytoplankton
Zooplancton

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations						Improvement
Salinity
pH
Oxygen balance
Temperature

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
medicinal plants						Improvement

Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Additional links and references

Edit links and references

Link	Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information