Case study:Heiligenbergerbeek

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:51, 26 September 2024 by Ascarr (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Christian
Main contact surname Spierings
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Vallei en Veluwe
Contact organisation web site http://www.vallei-veluwe.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Building with Nature

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Heiligenbergerbeek is a short stream that runs between Woudenberg and Amersfoort. Its stream valley mainly receives its water from seepage from the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, an ice-pushed ridge. The Heiligenbergerbeek also receives water from the sewage plants in Ede and Veenendaal. When water levels are low, it receives water from the river Rhine to flush the canals of Amersfoort, maintain sufficiently high water levels in the agricultural areas and keep the stream flowing. To ensure the stream keeps flowing, there are several weirs present. When water levels are high, part of the water is discharged by the Vosheuvelbeek and bypasses the city of Amersfoort. To meet WFD criteria, the mowing regime was altered to main channel mowing. Additonally, the stream was made wider in several locations, to allow for wider nature-friendly banks.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 6' 32.57" N, 5° 24' 8.85" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rijn
River basin Rijndelta

Subcatchment

River name Eem
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2) 700700 km² <br />70,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m) 6060 m <br />0.06 km <br />6,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Urban
Waterbody ID NL43_27



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Lunterse Beek


Site

Name Heiligenbergerbeek
WFD water body codes NL43_18
WFD (national) typology R5
WFD water body name Heiligenbergerbeek
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Sand
River corridor land use Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable), Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information