Case study:Reest

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:28, 20 April 2021 by Bas Wullems (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 52° 39' 59.74" N, 6° 18' 19.29" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename Sander
Main contact surname Verheijen
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Waterschap Drents Overijsselse Delta
Contact organisation web site http://www.wdodelta.nl
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Building with nature in streams

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Reest is a slow-flowing stream on a peat substrate that meanders over its full length, which is quite uncommon for Dutch streams. Stream restoration measures in the Reest aim to restore the hydrological conditions in the stream valley. The goal is to decrease the drainage capacity of the stream, leading to higher minimum groundwater levels in summer and increased seepage into the valley. This is supposed to improve the ecological potential for aquatic plants, invertebrates and fish. The surrounding valley should become better suited to support wet grassland. To this end, three 50-meter-long stretches have been lined with dead tree stubs. In addition, sand was deposited in the stream, raising the streambed by 50 cm. Finally, several barriers were created from tree trunks and rocks.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Extensive groundwater monitoring shows that the upstream groundwater level is rising, which was the intended effect of the measures taken. Locally, the stream is becoming significantly narrower due to vegetation growth in the treated areas. The measures have not been in effect long enough to draw conclusions about the effect on macroinvertebrates and fish.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Water board Drents Overijsselse Delta observes that it is important to plan and time maintenance well and to communicate well with water managers. Most notably, the developing vegetation caused the water to smell when water levels were high, so that weeds had to be cut along the entire stream.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rijn
River basin Rijndelta

Subcatchment

River name Vecht
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous, Organic
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Intensive agriculture (arable), Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural)
Waterbody ID NL36_OWM_014



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Beentjesgraven, Beneden Regge, De Doorbraak, Deurningerbeek, Dinkel Noord, Jufferbeek, Living Vechte-Dinkel, Marswetering, Midden Regge, Oude Bornschebeek... further results


Site

Name Reest
WFD water body codes NL35_Reest
WFD (national) typology R12
WFD water body name Reest
Pre-project morphology Low gradient passively meandering
Reference morphology Low gradient passively meandering
Desired post project morphology Low gradient passively meandering
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Peat
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Rough unimproved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category Less than 0.001
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information