Case study:Hofstadelva

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:17, 6 December 2019 by NINA (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 63° 29' 51.23" N, 11° 6' 40.33" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management
Country Norway
Main contact forename Mads
Main contact surname Johnsen
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)
Contact organisation web site http://www.nve.no
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Hofstadelva is a small side-river in a larger river system of Stjørdalselva. Due to risk of avalanche and erosion large sections of embarkments are established along both sides of Hofstadelva. Mitigation efforts included shaping of the embarkments to mimic the original stream structure, topsoil and turf transplants are used to improve natural vegetation recovery along the river.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


A monitoring program for fish, benthos, plant life and birds during 2016 - 2018. Natural recovery is observed for all species groups. Grazing domestic animals cause some erosion that limit establishment of forest, and soil erosion into the river might be limiting for benthos.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


Pre-project studies and cooperation have been important for the output. The involvemnt of experts in early phases of the projects have improved the positiv effects of mitigation. Mapping of species and ecosystem variables before the contruction is valuabel reference state for the monitoring after implementation.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Hofstadelva
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest some invasive species observed
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Grazing, settlement
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 19001,900 m <br />1.9 km <br />190,000 cm <br />
Project started 2011
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources NVE

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design NVE
Stakeholder engagement and communication NVE
Works and works supervision NVE
Post-project management and maintenance NVE
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Mitigating river environment following embankments for erosion control
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates: Abundance Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement
Fish: Age structure Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Birds Yes Yes No Yes No Inconclusive
river bank vegetation Yes Yes No Yes No Improvement


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://https://brage.nina.no/nina-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2433005/1320.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y Monitoring report Hofstadelva 2016
http://https://www.ntnu.no/c/document library/get file?uuid=0ede4612-85c7-4b0e-85f7-08d7ecbd5a39&groupId=10476 Report before embarkment Hofstadelva 2011

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information