Case study:Reopening and restoration of the stream Hovinbekken

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:20, 6 December 2019 by NIVA DK (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 59° 55' 13.33" N, 10° 47' 33.09" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Water quality, Urban
Country Norway
Main contact forename Agency of Urban Environment
Main contact surname Oslo municipality
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Oslo municipality
Contact organisation web site http://www.oslo.kommune.no
Partner organisations Sub-district (Vannområde) Oslo, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), The Norwegian Environmental Agency (Miljødirektoratet), The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), County Governor of Oslo og Viken
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Teglverksdammen
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Hovinbekken is one of several streams that was closed/cowered and putt in pipes during the urban development of Oslo and the sounding area in the 19th century and is now considered a Heavily Modified Water Body (HMWB). Through Oslo municipalitys program, “Byøkologisk program 2011-2026”, planes were made to reopen closed streams and create blue/green corridors throughout the city. One of the goals of this program was to reopen closed streams in Oslo and this included also the reopening of the stream Hovinbekken and restore parts of it back to a more natural state. Here is a list of restoration projects in Hovinbekken (complete, in progress or planned) with localities and stretches of the river that is going to be reopened and/or undergo different types of restoration work:

• Side stream Barkebåtbekken - Finnished in 2007

• The award winning Bjerkedalen park - Finished in 2013

• Tegelverkstomta - Finnished in 2015

• Ensjøbyen - In progress

• Jordal - In progress

• Klosterenga park - Planned

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


https://www.vann-nett.no/portal/#/waterbody/006-70-R

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Hovinbekken
WFD water body codes 006-70-R
WFD (national) typology REL1411
WFD water body name Hovinbekken nedstrøms Økern
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Urban
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 0.180.18 m³/s <br />180 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2011/01/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2026/01/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Oslo municipality, The Norwegian Environmental Agency (Miljødirektoratet)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Urbanisation
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish, Invertebrates
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Specific non-synthetic pollutants
Other reasons for the project Landscape enhancement, Recreation, Community demand


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.osloelveforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Prinsipper-for-gjen%C3%A5pning-av-bekker-og-elver-i-Oslo-2015.pdf
http://www.vannportalen.no/globalassets/nasjonalt/dokumenter/arrangementer/gjennomforte-arrangementer/restaureringsseminar/2010/7---donnum---sweco-urbane-strok.pdf
http://levendevassdrag.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Hovinbekken-faktaark.pdf
http://www.vannportalen.no/globalassets/nasjonalt/dokumenter/arrangementer/gjennomforte-arrangementer/restaureringsseminar/2013/10---jensen.pdf

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information