Case study:Restoration of the river Børselva

From RESTORE
Revision as of 09:56, 6 December 2019 by NIVA DK (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 68° 18' 13.95" N, 16° 42' 48.11" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Land use management - agriculture
Country Norway
Main contact forename Lars
Main contact surname Sæter
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation County Governor of Nordland
Contact organisation web site http://www.fylkesmannen.no/nordland
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Condition in 1999 - before measures: Siltation and overgrowth of macrophytes due to greatly reduced water flow (hydropower regulation) and drainage from agriculture. Very poor conditions for fish and other aquatic organisms. Nearly 70% of the water area in Børselva was covered by plants. Important wetland biotopes for wetland birds were about to disappear. Large parts of the trout’s spawning and growing areas were destroyed.

Measures implemented: Measures in the agricultural channel ("Bruksåskanalen"): Erosion control, establishment of sedimentation ponds with vegetation filters and revegetation along the channel. Establishment of three paved thresholds in Børselva, laying of spawning gravel. 1 km of the overgrown part of the river was opened with an excavator and by laying of fiber fabric with stone and gravel on top. Dredging and opening of the rest of the

Børselva with a large excavator ("Langemann"). Testing of different water discharges in Børselva (from the dam in Børsvatnet) - main focus on “flushing floods” and winter water flow. Condition in 2019 – after measures: Studies show major environmental improvements, but the environmental objectives of good chemical status and good ecological potential have not yet been achieved. Further measures are required to reduce agricultural runoff and to implement the final regime for environmentally based water discharges. As of 2019, the hydroelectric license is under review at NVE (The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate).

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The measures in the Børselva watercourse (Børselvvassdraget) have created better water quality and hydrological continuity (open water flow) in the formerly overgrown watercourse. The flow levels have improved, self-cleaning has improved and pollution has been reduced. This has resulted in a more varied benthic fauna, better spawning and growing conditions for the trout and improved conditions for the bird fauna.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information