Case study:Habitat improvement measures in Bortneelva
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.vannportalen.no/vannregioner/sogn--og-fjordane/vassomrade/nordfjord/nyhende-nordfjord/2017/miljotiltak-i-bortneelva/ |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology |
Country | Norway |
Main contact forename | Vegard |
Main contact surname | Fagerli |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | SFE Produksjon AS |
Contact organisation web site | http://sfe.no/konsern |
Partner organisations | Svelgen Kraft AS, The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, County Governor of Vestland, Sub-district Nordfjord /Bremanger municipality, Uni Research Miljø LFI, Rådgivende Biologer AS |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Svelgen Kraft (SK) utilize about 7% of the water that flows naturally in the Bortne-river for power production at the Svelgen I power plant. The established measures in the river will mitigate the impacts from this production and enhances the growing and living conditions for anadromous fish in the river.
At the request of landowners and a dialogue with the County Governor's environmental protection department, SK took the initiative to map the river. In the light of ongoing processes such as the EU's water framework directive and renewal of the concessions for the Svelgen I and II power plants, as well as SK's goal of operating environmentally sound water management, mapping and measures were prioritized. The survey was carried out by Uni Research Miljø LFI in 2016. Habitat conditions in the river was depicted and possible measures were suggested to improve the fish's growing and living conditions.
After clarification with landowners, other operators in the river and authorities, the physical work was carried out in autumn/winter 2016-17 by Machine3prenør1. Different types of measures have been established in an approximated 2 km long stretch of the river. These following measures was done: • Removal of migration barriers by building a “fish passage” with two ponds. • Construction of flow deflectors to concentrate the stream of water in the river, which gives the fish easier migration paths in the case of low water levels. • Laying of stone blocks and boulders in clusters to improve the fish's ability to hide. • Digging of ditches and opening of a natural "fish tunnels" to drain water to migration paths at low water levels.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|