Case study:LIFE Segura Riverlink (Through rivers)

From RESTORE
Revision as of 10:14, 28 August 2019 by SeguraCH (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: none specified



Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://https://www.chsegura.es/chs/cuenca/segurariverlink/contacto/
Themes Fisheries, Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country Spain
Main contact forename Eduardo
Main contact surname Lafuente
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura
Contact organisation web site http://https://www.chsegura.es/chs/cuenca/segurariverlink/riverlink/
Partner organisations Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS), Centro Tecnológico Agrario y Agroalimentario de la Universidad de Valladolid (ITAGRA-CT), Universidad de Murcia (UMU), Dirección General de Medio Ambiente de la Región de Murcia (CARM) & Asociación de Naturalistas del Sureste (ANSE)
Parent multi-site project

LIFE12 ENV/ES/001140

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The main objective of the project LIFE + SEGURA RIVERLINK is to improve connectivity between natural ecosystems through a series of actions aimed at restoring the river and recovering its function as a green corridor. This approach will reinforce the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Segura Basin and the results obtained will be transferred to the rest of the basin through the Hydrological Plan of the Segura Basin.

The use of a new concept in land management and planning, the green infrastructure approach, is the solution to reverse landscape fragmentation by connecting natural areas. This improves ecosystems health and resilience, increases biodiversity and benefits human populations by improving ecosystem services.

The project improves and strengthens fluvial connectivity by removing an unused weir and building eight fish passages. All these actions are accompanied by the ecological restoration of riverbanks.

The specific objectives of the project are the following:

• Recover the longitudinal continuity and permeability of the Segura and Benamor rivers in these catchment sections, thereby encouraging the restoration of their natural dynamics and increasing the mobility of the species along both rivers.

• Reverse fragmentation processes by returning the river and its riverbank to its function as ecological corridors and connectivity between protected areas within this location.

• Increase biodiversity through the existence and accessibility to a sufficient number of habitats for the feeding and reproduction of species associated with the river thus improving the resilience of the ecosystem against disturbances of natural or anthropogenic origin.

• Improve the ecological status of water bodies.

• Develop a Land Stewardship Network to involve private owners in the management of the river, increasing ties between the river and the adjacent territories.

• Increase social involvement in the management of the Segura River.

• Increase social awareness of the problems in aquatic and riparian ecosystems.

• Integrate the green infrastructure approach and the validated tools in the project into the Hydrological Plan of the Segura Basin.


The project also has a Volunteer Program and an Environmental Education Campaign to raise public awareness on the importance of preserving our river ecosystems and will promote its active participation.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


In order to validate these actions and evaluate the results, the project carried out a comprehensive monitoring program including biological, physical-chemical and hydromorphological indicators. This facilitated the subsequent transfer to the rest of the basin and other rivers with similar problems.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district C. H. Segura
River basin Segura

Subcatchment

River name Segura
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2) 1887018,870 km² <br />1,887,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 1000 - 2000 m
Maximum altitude (m) 14131,413 m <br />1.413 km <br />141,300 cm <br />
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Ibero-Macaronesian
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Segura's River Bioremediation, Strengthening associated biodiversity of habitat 92A0 and control of Invasive Alien Species in the Segura River (LIFE + Ripisilvanatura)


Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 5400054,000 m <br />54 km <br />5,400,000 cm <br />
Project started 2013/08/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2017/07/30
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources UE (49.83%)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information