Case study:Afon Clywdd

From RESTORE
Revision as of 12:20, 8 November 2018 by Alexrrc (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 10' 57.73" N, 3° 22' 7.56" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Planned
Project web site http://www.therrc.co.uk/sites/default/files/projects/40_afonclwyd.pdf
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Water quality
Country Wales
Main contact forename Jacques
Main contact surname Sisson
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Natural Resources Wales
Contact organisation web site http://naturalresources.wales/?lang=en
Partner organisations AECOM
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Clwyd (Photo 1 and Map 1) is a large catchment in north-east Wales, discharging north into the Irish Sea. The confluence of the Afon Clwyd with the Afon Elwy is downstream of St Asaph, which in November 2012 was subject to severe flooding resulting in a fatality. The impact of flooding from the Afon Elwy, which flows through the town, was exacerbated by the backing up of flow at the confluence with the Afon Clwyd, which was also in spate. In 2015, Natural Resources Wales commissioned AECOM Consultants to identify potential Working with Natural Processes (WWNP) in the Elwy catchment which would provide climate resilience to the proposed improvements to engineered flood defences in St Asaph (AECOM Consultants 2015). Following the study, AECOM wanted to develop techniques for rapid assessment of WWNP that could be applied to different types of catchments. AECOM used EU innovation funding to test techniques in a number of catchments, including this study of potential WWNP in the Vale of Clwyd. A systematic review of the aerial imagery, Ordnance Survey (OS) mapping and flood zone/flood extent information was carried out to identify the most important morphological features in the catchment and to identify locations where the WWNP measures could potentially be implemented across the catchment. In contrast to the Elwy, the identification process included an assessment of implementation and shortlisting to streamline the process. The overall impact of the modelled WWNP is a reduction in peak flow and an increase in time-to-peak (TP). Peak flow reduction was approximately 6% for the 5-year design event and approximately 1% for the 200-year design event.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information