Case study:Stabilization of hydrological situation on the Neznaika River

From RESTORE
Revision as of 03:56, 24 May 2016 by RosNIIVH (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 55° 33' 48.13" N, 37° 16' 33.30" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Flood risk management, Hydromorphology
Country Russia
Main contact forename Andrey
Main contact surname Pyatov
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation CentrRegionVodHoz
Contact organisation web site http://http://www.fgwu.ru/
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Neznaika river bed re-designing

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Neznaika river originates northeast village Aprelevka of Moscow Oblast and flows into the Desna river at the left bank on a distance of 30 km from the mouth. The river is 32 km long. Water regime of the river is characterized by high spring floods, and little discharge in winter and summer/autumn low-water period, that is sometimes interrupted by rain floods. Due to the intensive overgrowing shrubs and weeds, littering and silting of the riverbed within the reach of the Serednevo Village there has been a marked tightness of the bed and erosion of the banks in recent years. All these adversely affect the run-off ability of the spring and rain floods and lead to an annual overflow the channel of the river to the surface (depth of flood - 0.8-1.0 m) and flooding private land (gardens), outbuildings (workhouses, cages for kettle) and houses for a relatively long period of time. Currently, there has been a particularly dangerous situation in the area of low water bridge over the Neznaika river due to quick erosion of the right bank of the river.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Removal of dying and crushed trees and old shrubs vegetation, additional resistance of which may cause an increase in the level of flooding the surrounding area.
Floodplain / River corridor Removal of sediment along the entire length of area restored by applying the multifunctional machine TRUXOR DM5000.
Planform / Channel pattern Re-profiling of the river bed with a bottom width of 1.5 m and slopes 1:2.5 (in some places 1:2) facing the natural surface.
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information