Case study:Restoration of R. Odelouca 2

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:25, 18 September 2015 by Rcortes (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 37° 14' 41.67" N, 8° 29' 50.67" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Fisheries, Hydromorphology, Monitoring
Country Portugal
Main contact forename Rui
Main contact surname Cortes
Main contact user ID User:Rcortes
Contact organisation UTAD
Contact organisation web site http://www.utad.pt
Partner organisations Águas do Algarve, SA
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This is an integrated restoration programme in a Mediterranean catchment with a significant conservation value. The construction of the River Odelouca dam for improving water supply in the Algarve region of south Portugal, located in Natura 2000 protected area, involved the definition of a variety of compensation measures including environmental requalification of selected river segments not affected by the reservoir. We cover the whole sequence of the project: a) characterization and selection of reaches to rehabilitate based on the definition of physiographic units and the relative quantification of impacts; b) implementation of soil engineering techniques for improving riparian habitat, bank stability and to control invasive species c) defining best river channel habitat improvement options for endangered endemic fish populations using two-dimensional hydraulic modeling (R2D); d) post-project appraisal and monitoring of floristic succession, fish, benthic fauna and habitat .

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


The success of the defined measures was hampered by three principal factors, firstly failure to engage local landowners early in the programme; the timing of key tasks, such as planting riparian trees; continued difficulty to control sources of environmental disturbance, in particular serious and continuous point pollution from animal husbandry. Consequently fish assemblages in all stream reaches were still dominated by aliens and highly tolerant species, and native cyprinids were low abundant or absent, revealing the fish index of biotic integrity a low environmental quality.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information