Case study:Tahlequah Felts Park- Illlinois River Restoration Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:17, 10 July 2015 by Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 35° 54' 6.90" N, 94° 58' 17.88" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://lid.okstate.edu/illinois-river-restoration-project-information
Themes Environmental flows and water resources, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology, Water quality
Country USA
Main contact forename Jason
Main contact surname Vogel
Main contact user ID User:Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site http://lid.okstate.edu
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Tahlequah History Trail - Illinois River Restoration Project

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This site is a 453 foot reach of perennial stream located adjacent to Felts Park. This park also receives a lot of local traffic and safety was an issue due to significant erosion and undercutting of the bank abutting the park. Flow in the channel was shallow and habitat virtually nonexistent. To alleviate these problems, the channel alignment was moved away from the bank of the outerbend and deepened. Two log j-hooks followed by brush toes were constructed for grade control and bank protection. Bank slopes were regraded and floodplain benches were added to alleviate the pressure on the banks during high flow events. A double step cross-vane was constructed at the downstream end of the project for grade control. Scour pools were added downstream of each instream structure.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information