Case study:Massadammen-dam removal in River Tabergsån

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:02, 3 February 2015 by Kasvio (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by JoshRRC (talk) to last revision by Admin)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 57° 42' 24.46" N, 14° 6' 59.43" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower, Hydromorphology, Spatial planning
Country Sweden
Main contact forename Peter
Main contact surname Lindvall
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Länsstyrelsen i Jönköpings län
Contact organisation web site http://projektwebbar.lansstyrelsen.se/vattern/Sv/besoksmal-vatterbackar/tabergsan/Pages/5-massadammen.aspx
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
After restoration (photo. Maria Arola)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Massadammen dam in the South of Jönköping in the River Tabergsån. The dam was built in 1906 for hydropower but the hydro power station was shut down in 1950´s. Because the dam was an obsticle for migrating fish it was decided to remove to improve the conditions for fish. The aim was to build fishpassage, increase the spawning areas for trout and to reduce the regulation and maintenance of the dam. The first plan of the restoration met heavy resistace from the local people because they wanted to maintain the water level. The new plan was made and three dams were built instead of one in the dammed area. The project was good example of the co-operation between different organization (municipality, consultants and local people) to find a goos solution for all parties.

Most of the work was done between early august to late october in 2011. Because of the restoration spawning area for fish increased from 29 000 to 36 000 m2. Also densities of trout increased in the upstream. Densities were measured to be 5 times higher after than before restorations. Total cost of the project was approximately 174 000 euros.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Restored channel (photo. Maria Arola)
Removed dam (photo. Maria Arola)
Added gravel (photo. Maria Arola)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Massadammen-Motala Ström
WFD water body codes 067
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name Tabergsån
Pre-project morphology Embanked, Artificial bed, Artificial channel
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2007
Works started 2011/08/01
Works completed 2011/10/31
Project completed 2011/10/31
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 174174 k€ <br />174,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Barriers to fish migration, Hydropower
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information