Case study:Restoration of Rusenski Lom River near Ivanovo

From RESTORE
Revision as of 08:59, 19 September 2012 by Marinela (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 43° 41' 55.00" N, 25° 59' 35.56" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Hydromorphology
Country Bulgaria
Main contact forename Ivan
Main contact surname Hristov
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation WWF Danube Carpathian programme Bulgaria
Contact organisation web site http://www.wwf.bg
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Rusenski Lom River

Subcatchment

River name Rusenski Lom
Area category
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category Less than 100 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Pontic Province
Dominant land cover Intensive agriculture (arable)
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Protected area "Lomovete"
WFD water body codes BG1RL120R013
WFD (national) typology BGTR2
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Sand
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008/03/01
Works started 2008/09/01
Works completed 2009/03/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources WWF Germany, DBU

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design 1 - 10 k€
Stakeholder engagement and communication 1 - 10 k€
Works and works supervision 1 - 10 k€
Post-project management and maintenance Less than 1 k€
Monitoring Less than 1 k€



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management, Flood defence
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Structure & condition of riparian/ lake shore zones Inconclusive

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Inconclusive

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information