Case study:Project Usk River Restoration (PURR) 2012-2013

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:54, 15 September 2014 by Eldridge123 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 56' 56.21" N, 3° 23' 29.27" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/projects/purr2.php
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Land use management - agriculture, Water quality
Country Wales
Main contact forename Stephen
Main contact surname Marsh-Smith
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Wye & Usk Foundation
Contact organisation web site http://www.wyeuskfoundation.org/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Project picture

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Following successful completion of the Project Usk River Restoration, PURR2 turned our focus to the river above Brecon. PURR2 was a £67,000 project, funded by Beacons Trust and Environment Agency Wales (now Natural Resources Wales). Its primary objective was to restore 4km of tributary stream, along with the continuation of the invasive weeds programme and expanding the availability of fishing via the Passport within the National Park. Habitat Improvements Four sites were selected in the Senni catchment, an important spawning tributary of the upper Usk. Fencing and coppicing commenced at the end of 2012 and was completed by the end of April 2013. Just over 4km of river was restored. The main objective is to increase the numbers of salmon and trout but the work will also improve the biodiversity of the Usk and benefit UK BAP and/or Annex II SAC species such as otter, white clawed crayfish and lampreys, to name but a few. Other Achievements In November 2012, WUF, volunteers and Keep Wales Tidy joined a group of canoeists to clean up the river Usk between Sennybridge and Brynich Lock, below Brecon. The clean-up was a huge success with 50 bags of litter collected, along with the usual tyres, bikes and road signs. The litter was disposed of by Powys County Council. Under PURR2, the Wye & Usk Passport’s Usk fishing was expanded further. 8 new beats were included in the 2013 Passport, taking the total Usk fisheries in the scheme to 38. 4 of these new beats were within the project area: Middle Senni; Ashford House; Canal & Rivers Trust (Llanfrynach) and Trallong & Abercamlais (extended previous Abercamlais beat). The project also enabled us to continue our invasive weed eradication programme in the upper Usk catchment. In September 2012 we surveyed and sprayed Japanese knotweed plants along 37km of the main Usk and selected sites on the Rhiangholl and Menasgin tributaries.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information