Case study:Upper Emscher

From RESTORE
Revision as of 13:07, 15 May 2014 by EGLV (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 29' 43.59" N, 7° 32' 33.65" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology
Country Germany
Main contact forename Mechthild
Main contact surname Semrau
Main contact user ID User:EGLV
Contact organisation Emschergenossenschaft
Contact organisation web site http://eglv.de
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Emscher restoration

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Part of the integrated river basin management for the Emscher Region (865 km2, 2.700 inhabitants/ km2) is the revitalization of the river Emscher and its tributaries. Due to industrialization the waterbodies were systematically developed as open wastewater sewers in the beginning of the 20th century. Economic and technical alternatives such as closed sewer systems could not be implemented due to constant subsidence caused by coal mining. Momentarily, the river system is being restructured in order to enable the Emscher to once again be a fully functioning, continuous water-based ecosystem with typical topology and vegetation. An ecological concept based on the assumption of a non-interrupted river as a connection from the source to the mouth has been developed.

Studies on the feasibility of restructuring the Emscher show, that due to coal mining, industrial impacts and population changes the “original” conditions can never be reached again. It will not be possible to return the Emscher to its original, meandering state. Therefore, the reference conditions are no direct goals for the river restoration, but they give orientation in the planning procedure.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Rhine
River basin Rhine

Subcatchment

River name Emscher
Area category
Area (km2) 865865 km² <br />86,500 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology quarternary, holocene
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Urban, Intensive agriculture (arable), Grassland, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural)
Waterbody ID DE_NRW_2772



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Flood detention basin (HRB) Ickern-Mengede


Site

Name Upper Emscher section
WFD water body codes DE_NRW_2772_64190
WFD (national) typology Type 18: small loess-loam dominated lowland river
WFD water body name Emscher
Pre-project morphology concrete lined bed and bank, Straightened, Over deepened
Reference morphology Actively meandering, groundwater dominated
Desired post project morphology Low gradient passively meandering, enabled contact between floodplain and water body
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Groundwater, quick run-off
Dominant substrate Clay, Silt, loam
River corridor land use urban, Improved/semi-improved grassland/pasture, Broadleaf/mixed woodland (semi natural), Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information