Case study:Diversion of the River Nith

From RESTORE
Revision as of 15:36, 29 August 2012 by NickRRC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
4.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 55° 22' 42.47" N, 4° 18' 11.36" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Scotland
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID User:NickRRC
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations East Ayrshire Council, SEPA, SNH, RSPB, Nith Salmon Fisheries Board, New Cumnock Angling Association, Halcrow, River Restoration Centre
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Plan of 2000 Nith channel diversion. From RRC Manual of Techniques (2002) - courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


PHASE 1: 2000 - Temporary diversion of the Nith to the north west of its current floodplain to allow for coal extraction by Scottish Coal.

The Nith is an important salmon and trout fishery, however overgrazing, agriculture and past open-cast mining along the reach have affected invertebrate populations and fish spawning grounds.

The primary restoration criteria for the 2000 restoration were:

- design which would convey a 1 in 50 year flood.

- channel which would not dry up during low flow.

- design mimicing pre-diversion channel - ie. similar meander loops, pool-riffle-run sequences and channel profiles.

- design which would create opportunities for enhancement of biodiversity (over and above pre-diversion conditions).

Work commenced in April 2000 and was completed during September of the same year.


PHASE 2: During 2004, the former course was enhanced and reconnected to the rest of the river and the temporary channel cut off to allow mining to progress across the floodplain. The site was subject to significant post-restoration biological monitoring as part of a PhD programme through CRESS (Centre for River Ecosystem Science - University of Stirling) - to ensure the new channel was performing well, ecologically.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Scotland RBD
River basin Solway

Subcatchment

River name Nith
Area category 1000 - 10000 km²
Area (km2) 12301,230 km² <br />123,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m) 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br />
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Great Britain
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Nith, west of New Cumnock
WFD water body codes 10612
WFD (national) typology Mid, Small, Calcareous
WFD water body name River Nith (u/s New Cumnock)
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology Reproduce hydromorphology and planform of former channel.
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Primarily salmon and brown trout.
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Mixed gravel, pebble and boulder
River corridor land use Pasture and open-cast mining.
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m) 4.54.5 m <br />0.0045 km <br />450 cm <br />
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 30003,000 m <br />3 km <br />300,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2000/04/01
Works completed 2000/09/01
Project completed
Total cost category more than 10000 k€
Total cost (k€) Phase 1: 3900000"Phase" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Scottish Coal

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Halcrow
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision Morrison
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring University of Stirling



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Original course running over coal deposits. Channel diverted to exploit resource, while maintaining WFD status.


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications 2000: channel bed/ground layer consisted of existing substrate with clay lining. 2004: Geotextile reinforcement of banks, to reduce bank erosion. Clay mattress lining to prevent water percolating through unconsolidated substrate and flowing as groundwater through potentially contaminated mine tailings. Gravel added to bed to create habitat diversity for invertebrates and fish.
Floodplain / River corridor 2000: Containment bund constructed to prevent flooding of mine workings.
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Addition of boulders to bed, to provide habitat for fish.
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Macrophytes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Awaiting results
Invertebrates Yes Yes No Yes Yes Awaiting results

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Channel bed morphology. Yes Yes No Yes No
Substrate particle size/composition. No Yes No Yes No


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Channel diversion in construction (2000). Courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.
Diverted channel once connected (2000). Courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.
Diversion channel prior to connection - rip-rap and riffle visible (2000). Courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.
Diversion channel (2004) showing geotextile bank reinforcement and profiled gravel bed for habitat enhancement. Courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.
Diversion channel (2004) showing geotextile bank reinforcement, profiled gravel bed and in-channel boulder placement for habitat enhancement. Courtesy of the River Restoration Centre.


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description
http://www.cress.stir.ac.uk/news/documents/CharlesPerfect.pdf Macroinvert. Monitoring
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radioscotland/gallery/landscapes water/ 2004 Diversion Image Gallery - BBC Scotland
http://www.therrc.co.uk/pdf/manual/MAN 11 2.pdf RRC - Manual of Techniques

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information