Case study:Eddleston water
Project overview
Status | In progress |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.tweedforum.org/projects/current-projects/eddleston |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydromorphology |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Alex |
Main contact surname | Baillie |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Tweed Forum |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.tweedforum.org/ |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Historical straightening and changes in land management which aimed to improve agricultural production has created a channel which is currently classified as “poor” by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). The channel also causes occasional flooding in Eddleston and Peebles when rainfall is heavy.
Restoration design aims to restore natural physical habitats both in the river corridor and the wide catchment, to achieve “good” WFD status. A secondary aim is to reduce the current level of flood risk.
Restoration strategy measures include: planting of riparian and floodplain forests, breaching embankments to create flood storage areas, re-meandering of the channel, introduction of large woody debris, creating local ponds and wetlands and setting fences back from the banks. Monitoring is in place to establish baseline conditions for rainfall and surface groundwater flows as well as water quality and ecology.
The Eddleston Water project Phase II aimed to deliver on the main two objectives of habitat restoration for improvement of WFD ecological status and improved natural flood risk management (NFM). It has done this by designing and implementing a series of physical interventions in the catchment, with a particular emphasis on both improving river habitats and addressing the sources and pathways of flooding. Areas of woodland have been planted, stretches of historically straightened river returned to a natural meandering course, and each carefully planned, measured and recorded, such that their effectiveness can be monitored over time. Indeed, the Eddleston is now becoming one of the most detailed studies of its type in Europe. The study has taken a catchment approach that will also realise benefits for water quality, fisheries, conservation of biodiversity, landscape and recreation. Early work has also been completed on assessing the delivery of other ecosystem service benefits alongside WFD improvements and NFM interventions
Phase III began in 2013, led by the School of the Environment, while a separate project on River Rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale has just been completed by the Centre in combination with University of Stirling, leading to two publications on a conceptual framework for optimising the outcomes of river restoration, and an earlier one which reviewed the record of restoration projects at the reach and catchment scale across Scotland over the last 20 years.
The project is a partnership initiative led by the Tweed Forum, the Scottish Government, Scottish Environment Protection Agency and the University of Dundee. Other key partners include the British Geological Survey, Scottish Borders Council, the Forestry Commission, Scottish Natural Heritage, the Tweed Foundation, National Farmers’ Union of Scotland, Scottish Land and Estates, and the Environment Agency of England.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Tweed Catchment Management Plan
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Supplementary funding informationFunded by the SEPA River Restoration Fund Scottish Government awarded funding over three financial years 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|