Case study:Natura 2000conservation in Alta Tuscia Viterbese LIFE04 NAT/IT/000153

From RESTORE
Revision as of 08:35, 20 January 2014 by A.goltara (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 42° 36' 44.14" N, 11° 46' 15.23" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.life-natura.viterbo.it/
Themes
Country Italy
Main contact forename Francesco
Main contact surname Stefani
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Viterbo County
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The area of intervention is indeed a strip of territory, which for historical reasons and geographical conditions, has been relatively little used and so it was particularly intact. For these characteristics, in this particular area have been identified seven SIC showing the particular concentration of species and habitats priority.

Unfortunately, in recent years occurred excessive use of resources and environments and abandonment and neglect of large portions of land that have caused serious degradation phenomena (pollution of water, simplification of environments, surface soil erosion, spread of exotic species,… etc.).

Particularly in view of the situation described above, the project has provided actions: - Preliminary analysis environment, fauna and flora; - Training courses, meetings of public awareness, production of informative material and construction of a dedicated Web site; - Recovery territorial Interventions (removal of exotic species, forest management, rehabilitation of degraded habitats); - Monitoring the quality of natural environments and the impact of works.

The main results achieved were as follows: 1. Adherence to the system of certification of forest management recognized at the level of European forests Regional Natural Reserve of the "Selva Lamone of" Action A6; 2. Safeguard measures in the woods, Action C1; 3. Construction of infrastructure read to prevent the passage on lawns (presence of rare species and orchids), Action C2; 4. Restoration of riparian buffer strip of River Olpeta and Lake Mezzano, Action C3; 5. Implementation of operations of wetlands along the riparian zone at the River Olpeta and Lake Mezzano, Action C4; 6. Periodic cutting grass in areas at risk of colonization by the invasive shrubs, Action D1; 7. Implementation of operations for forest management, Action D2; 8. Maintenance network paths of Regional Natural Reserve of the Selva Lamone and Lake Mezzano, Action D3; 9. Maintenance of riparian buffer strip at the River Olpeta and Lake Mezzano, Action D4; 10. Distribution of leaflets to the public with the involvement of schools and universities, Action E1; 11. Distribution of brochures to the public with the involvement of schools and universities, Action E2; 12. Allocation of sixteen boards and information boards in the most important points of SCI and Commons, Action E5; 13. Realization of press conferences, Action E6; 14. Accomplishing a public meeting with farmers' category, Action E9

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


The project then has made concrete interventions naturalistic engineering and maintenance of natural forests designed to initiate a process of recovery now cannot be extended. The actions, even if localized, will bring a significant improvement in natural environments involved, with the consequent benefit to the species of animals and plants that they also host leading to increased intrinsic biodiversity habitats and encouraging the preservation of animal and plant species included in the Directive.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Mezzano Lake overview.
Removal of invasive species along the Olpeta River.
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name Olpeta river in Vallegiardino area and Mezzano lake spring
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations Area of Special Conservation Interest
Protected species present Yes
Invasive species present Yes
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2004/09/01
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 2007/08/31
Total cost category
Total cost (k€) 658.738658.738 k€ <br />658,738 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Structure & condition of riparian/lake shore zones
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Temperature
Other reasons for the project improving natural environment


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Control of invasive species, Facilitate natural regeneration of riparian vegetation, Extensive planting
Planform / Channel pattern
Other meintenance of the trails network, construction of infrastructure read to prevent the passage on lawns
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Realization of press conferences, public meeting, allocation of boards and information boards, distribution of brochures
Other Adherence to the system of certification of forest management


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information