Case study:Restoration of the original riverbed of the Steinbaechlein

From RESTORE
Revision as of 22:02, 16 January 2014 by Anna.polazzo (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 44' 27.33" N, 7° 17' 1.77" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Water quality, Urban
Country France
Main contact forename Onema
Main contact surname (Office national de l’eau et des milieux aquatiques)
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Onema
Contact organisation web site http://www.onema.fr/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Steinbaechlein is a 14.5 kilometers long secondary arm of the Doller, the latter having a mainly agricultural 215 km2 wide watershed. In the XIX century, a 400 long meander of the Steinbaechlein was cut in order to provide water to a chemical factory. Following the dismantling of the factory and in the framework of a new business and residential development, the river was returned to its old bed. The work was motivated by the need to increase the available surface for a commercial building and the will to get the river away from polluted soil. The new bed was excavated in the wasteland that had developed in place of the former course of the river. Diversified cross sections and widths were established and the profile was fixed by two sills; helophytes were planted in the banks and in the riverbed along almost all the restored stretch. On the left side of the river a wetland was created, to be used as flood retention area.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


No pre-project assessment was carried out. In 2007, electrofishing was conducted by the National Office for Water and Aquatic Environments (ONEMA), showing a good recolonization of the restored stretch by fish; juveniles of trout, target species in the river, were also found. Since then no other monitoring has been done or is foreseen.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information