Case study:Restoration of the lowland river system Grote Nete

From RESTORE
Revision as of 14:32, 27 September 2013 by LauraRRC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 6' 1.06" N, 4° 47' 27.58" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.life-grotenete.be/
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Belgium
Main contact forename Tom
Main contact surname De Beelde
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Natuurpunt Beheer v.z.w.
Contact organisation web site http://natuurpunt.be/default.aspx
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


This project targeted 1850 ha in the valley of the Grote Nete to restore a habitat mosaic landscape. The valley holds 11 remarkable habitat types, including sand dune and dune-heath vegetation, dry heath, species-rich grasslands, aquatic plant communities and forests on wet soils. Some rare species are also present.

Natuurpunt and the Flemish Region have established several protected areas in the valley. However afforestation, eutrophication, habitat fragmentation, intensification of agriculture, and disturbances still have adverse affects for the natural hydrology of the river.

Restoration works involved clearing trees, re-naturalising river courses and landscape hydrology, eradication of invasive water plants and improving spawning possibilities for fish in the river system. An integrated management plan for the site would be prepared and actions implemented to ensure permanent conservation of the habitats.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


As a result from restoration actions, a total of 32 ha of poplar plantations were felled or will die standing to make room for alluvial forest. Additionally, 42 ha of former agricultural land will spontaneously evolve towards forest, as a result of measures taken by the project.

Also, good grazing management practices have been implemented to help developing a gradient of open and heavily grazed forests, as well as closed and almost non-grazed forests. 18 weekend cottages were removed and 15 horticultural ponds were restored to be re-integrated in the landscape.

Another important aspect of the project was the re-naturalisation of the river De Kleine Hoofdgracht. This action was implemented by the province of Antwerp, which removed the dikes along a stretch of 690 m and created more than 2 ha of open water, marshland and oxbows etc. The result is an improved habitat for endangered fish, such as the target species, brook lamprey and spined loach.

Pine plantations and sod were cut, now providing a land dune of 15 ha for wind dynamics and free recreation to take place and contribute in keeping this area an open habitat.

Over 60 ha is under continuous management of the area by a local farmer partnership. Also hiking trails were installed (with bridges and board walks) and hiking brochures were produced to increase the ecotourism value of the region for visitors.

Lessons learnt

Edit project overview to modify the lessons learnt.


See references


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information