Case study:Wettingen, nature-like fish pass

From RESTORE
Revision as of 18:16, 6 September 2013 by SFW Rob (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 27' 24.77" N, 8° 19' 16.26" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Economic aspects, Fisheries, Hydropower
Country Switzerland
Main contact forename Walter
Main contact surname Binder
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The nature-like bypass channels middle part has a rock-cascade pass. (photo by Pinja Kasvio)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


In Wettingen there is a great example of a small nature-like bypass channel at the weir Wettingen on the Limmat downstream from Zurich which surmounts the very big height of 18.30 m. Nature-like bypass channels total length is 620 m, discharge 0.4 m³/s and additional attraction water is 0.6 m³/s. Total difference in water level is 18.30 m with high mean slope 3 %.The lower section consists of a technical fish. Whereas a near-nature water course was formed in the upper section, a rocky-cascade fishway with a height of 10 meters surmounts the biggest part of the altitude. Due to the limited space the lower section consists of a vertical-slot-pass which is converted into a collection-gallery at the power house. Leading back the water course to the power house is not possiblewhen it comes to bigger bypass channels. Splitting the water into two branches offers a good solution for this small channel. The main branch continues towards the tailwater as a near-nature water course and ends further downstream, where a connection to the natural river bed is possible. The smaller second branch diverts from the main branch towards the power house and is formed as a vertical slot-pass.

The nature-like bypass channel has a trail on its side, so the residents can enjoy the lovely scenery and see some trouts when passing by.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Nature-like bypass channel: River Limmat, Wettingen (photo: Walter Binder)
Downstream section of the River Limmat (photo: Walter Binder)
Rock-cascade fish pass on River Limmat (photo:Pinja Kasvio)
River Limmat, hydropowerplant (photo: Pinja Kasvio)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology Bedrock cascade, Artificial channel
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Bedrock, Gravel
River corridor land use Urban, Broadleaf/mixed plantation
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information