Case study:The Ciobarciu Wetland Project

From RESTORE
Revision as of 17:28, 6 September 2013 by SFW Rob (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 2' 56.12" N, 27° 51' 34.74" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.ciobarciu.ro
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Anca
Main contact surname Savin
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
Contact organisation web site http://www.apeprut.ro
Partner organisations Institute for Inland Water Management RIZA, Regional Water Board Hunze&Aa's, Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management)
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Ciobarciu Wetland - present situation

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut. In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow. The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Ciobarciu area - before restoration
Ciobarciu area - during restoration
Ciobarciu area - after restoration (1)
Ciobarciu area - after restoration (2)
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Prut Barlad

Subcatchment

River name Prut
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Eastern Plains
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake


Site

Name Ciobarciu
WFD water body codes RORW13.1.15_B5
WFD (national) typology RO09a
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked
Reference morphology Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate Silt
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient 0.001
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 5,500 m5.5 km <br />550,000 cm <br />
Project started 2003/03/01
Works started 2006/06/01
Works completed 2006/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€) 388 k€388,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources The Netherlands Gouvernment program

MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl Albert Remmelzwaal
Stakeholder engagement and communication Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority Dan Badarau
Works and works supervision Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority Anca Savin
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Flood risk management
Hydromorphology Continuity for organisms
Biology
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetlands/removal of embankments
Planform / Channel pattern Re-instatement of old course
Other Restoration flow on old Jijia
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement) Land purchase/Improved public access
Other Consultation


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Continuity for organisms Improvement

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents




Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description
http://www.ciobarciu.ro The website of the project
http://www.apeprut.ro The website of Prut River Basin Water Administration

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information