Case study:Lek Bij Everdingen

From RESTORE
Revision as of 16:21, 5 September 2013 by NickRRC (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 51° 58' 4.80" N, 5° 10' 26.40" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Netherlands
Main contact forename M
Main contact surname Greijdanus-Klass
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst
Contact organisation web site http://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/over ons/adressen en diensten/landelijkediensten/waterdienst/
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Rhine
River basin Lek

Subcatchment

River name Lek
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Central Plains
Dominant land cover Grassland, Urban
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Lek Everdingen
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology R7
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel, Straight
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body true
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Tidal, Estuary
Dominant substrate Gravel, Silt
River corridor land use Urban, Extensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 700 m0.7 km <br />70,000 cm <br />
Project started
Works started 2005/01/01
Works completed 2006/01/01
Project completed
Total cost category 100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst
Stakeholder engagement and communication Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst
Monitoring 100 - 500 k€ Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Navigation, Channelising of the river
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Flow velocities, Continuity for organisms
Biology Invertebrates, Macrophytes, Fish: Abundance
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Introduction of coil rolls to protect groynes
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Invertebrates Yes Yes Yes Inconclusive
Macrophytes Yes Yes Yes Inconclusive
Fish: Abundance Yes Yes Yes Inconclusive

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information